RE: [DISCUSS]S3-based secondary storage

o: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS]S3-based secondary storage > > Hi Chip, > > As I understand, 509 "backs" the NFS secondary storage using a S3 > compatible Object Store. I'm proposing that CS uses any S3 ased Object Store > as th

Re: [DISCUSS]S3-based secondary storage

Clear distinction. Thanks for elaborating. > Hari > > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2013 7:56 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]S3-based secondary storage

RE: [DISCUSS]S3-based secondary storage

56 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]S3-based secondary storage Isn't this a duplicate of CLOUDSTACK-509? Can we close CLOUDSTACK-714? On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Hari Kannan wrote: > 714

Re: [DISCUSS]S3-based secondary storage

Isn't this a duplicate of CLOUDSTACK-509? Can we close CLOUDSTACK-714? On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Hari Kannan wrote: > 714

Re: [DISCUSS]S3-based secondary storage

Hari, I confess I never setup Swift or bluster for use as secondary storage, but I thought we already supported S3 based sec storage, isn't it the case ? From your wiki entry it seems that NFS is still needed for bootstrapping things, we definitely need to check that. If that were the case I wou

Re: [DISCUSS]S3-based secondary storage

Hari, I have submitted this patch for 4.1.0, and it had been merged into master. Please CLOUDSTACK-509 for more information regarding status, as well as, pointers to the patch review and design document. Thanks, -John On Dec 27, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Hari Kannan wrote: > Hello All, > > I wish

[DISCUSS]S3-based secondary storage

Hello All, I wish to propose a S3-based secondary storage in CloudStack - I have added some details here along with a JIRA ticket 714 Please review and comment Hari Kannan