, questions are greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 5:11 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
In this spec, security
iradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 5:52 PM
> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
>
> That is just so confusing. So if we do ENI-style in 4.2, the rules for
> accessing a VM within a VPC will be the union o
IC hot
>plug feature( something like ENI) in 4.2.
>
>Anthony
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 5:29 PM
>> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]
>>Cheers,
> >>Anthony
> >>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com] On
> >>> Behalf Of kdam...@apache.org
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 5:17 PM
> >&
ature proposal just got more awesome!
>
>-kd
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 5:21 PM
>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation
y, January 16, 2013 5:21 PM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
>
>Correct,
>there are several types of guest shared network, Zone-wide guest shared
>network Domain-wide guest shared network Account-specific gue
nal Message-
> From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com] On
> Behalf Of kdam...@apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 5:17 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
>
>
>
>>
>> >-Original Message-
>> >From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
>> >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:36 PM
>> >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Iso
the same time.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:55 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
>
&g
3 1:36 PM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
>
>Folks please pass on comments if any, otherwise it is assumed that the spec
is
>approved by the community
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Anthony Xu [mai
--Original Message-
> > From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.jp]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:29 PM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
> >
> > Hi Anthony,
> >
>
t: Re: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
>
> Hi Anthony,
>
> Understood - thanks for the update.
>
> Dave.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Anthony Xu
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > For 4.1 , this feature is only for
hony
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.jp]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:33 AM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
> >
> > Hi M
oudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
>
> Hi Manan,
>
> I'm interested in this feature - when (roughly) are you planning to
> commit
> this to master?
>
> Are you planning the full list of features from yo
Hi Manan,
I'm interested in this feature - when (roughly) are you planning to commit
this to master?
Are you planning the full list of features from your requirements doc
(including support for Adavnced, Isolated networks) in 4.1?
Thanks in advance,
Dave.
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Manan
Yes, FS definitely needs updating. Please also look at the "Future"
section of Alena's FS.
Regards,
Manan Shah
On 1/4/13 1:57 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam"
wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:16:44AM +0530, Manan Shah wrote:
>> Hi Chip,
>>
>> As Alena had mentioned in her FS, her focus was to ini
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:16:44AM +0530, Manan Shah wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> As Alena had mentioned in her FS, her focus was to initially support only
> the functionality that was enabled in CS 2.2. She had created a section in
> her FS that talked about Future release plans.
>
> My requirements pa
Hi Chip,
As Alena had mentioned in her FS, her focus was to initially support only
the functionality that was enabled in CS 2.2. She had created a section in
her FS that talked about Future release plans.
My requirements page covers requirements for both, the CS 2.2 use case as
well as the broade
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Manan Shah wrote:
> I am proposing the requirements document that I have created.
This confuses me a bit. Are you suggesting that the functionality
built by Alena (per the "original FS") needs to be changed? Are you
adding new features? What's the difference bet
I am proposing the requirements document that I have created.
Regards,
Manan Shah
On 1/3/13 3:59 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>So which spec is the one you are proposing?
>
>- chip
>
>
>On Jan 3, 2013, at 6:50 PM, Manan Shah wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose a new feature for enab
So which spec is the one you are proposing?
- chip
On Jan 3, 2013, at 6:50 PM, Manan Shah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new feature for enabling Security Groups
> Isolation in Advanced Zone in CS 4.1. I have created a JIRA ticket and
> provided the requirements at the following lo
Hi,
I would like to propose a new feature for enabling Security Groups
Isolation in Advanced Zone in CS 4.1. I have created a JIRA ticket and
provided the requirements at the following location. Please provide
feedback on the requirements.
There was also a discussion started in mid-November on t
22 matches
Mail list logo
