Rohit,
Thanks, it's good to see it be consistent across the board
-Kelven
On 1/28/13 3:47 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>To avoid confusion, I removed the entityType field from the particular
>param in deployvmcmd. Pl. read the commit message, for MAP type params
>it's always processed a map of st
To avoid confusion, I removed the entityType field from the particular
param in deployvmcmd. Pl. read the commit message, for MAP type params
it's always processed a map of string,string and the processing should
be done by an api writer at cmd class level and it's not done in
ApiDispatcher.
commi
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Kelven Yang wrote:
> I have a question about a change in @Parameter at API layer, in regards to
> entityType, does anyone know the reason behind why it has to go through
> with some Response class which in turn declares links to the entity class
> via @EntityRefere
ache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Question about @Parameter (entityType)
>
>
>
> On 1/27/13 9:52 PM, "Mice Xia" wrote:
>
> >i have the same question and i found this:
> >
> >http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox//incubator-cloudstack-
> dev/20
On 1/27/13 9:52 PM, "Mice Xia" wrote:
>i have the same question and i found this:
>
>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox//incubator-cloudstack-dev/201301.
>mbox/%3ccanlssbxhw5fhwrn3bs+yoj6ycpbbdu1khjzq4ncaa59fqfa...@mail.gmail.com
>%3E
>
>seems this annotation is used for converting entity
i have the same question and i found this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox//incubator-cloudstack-dev/201301.mbox/%3ccanlssbxhw5fhwrn3bs+yoj6ycpbbdu1khjzq4ncaa59fqfa...@mail.gmail.com%3E
seems this annotation is used for converting entity UUID->ID
-Mice
2013/1/28 Kelven Yang :
> I have
I have a question about a change in @Parameter at API layer, in regards to
entityType, does anyone know the reason behind why it has to go through
with some Response class which in turn declares links to the entity class
via @EntityReference annotation?
And in DeployVMCmd as an example, there is a
