Re: [ASFCS40] New source code build available (4.0.0.beta6) for testing

2012-10-08 Thread Noah Slater
I am pernickety (or annoying, depending on who you ask!) so thank you for your patience. :) On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Noah, > > I appreciate your attention to detail here, but I think you are > reading too much into these developer builds. > > We agreed to use the bet

Re: [ASFCS40] New source code build available (4.0.0.beta6) for testing

2012-10-08 Thread Chip Childers
Noah, I appreciate your attention to detail here, but I think you are reading too much into these developer builds. We agreed to use the betaX string earlier on the list, but really only for the purpose of having a distinguishing characteristic in the file names. That's all they are for. I'm ac

Re: [ASFCS40] New source code build available (4.0.0.beta6) for testing

2012-10-07 Thread Noah Slater
Okay, thanks for the clarification. I've brought it up a few times (as you say) and each time it sounded like it was going to change, but then in another thread, a newer build pops up with it in the tarball name, so I keep wondering what it means. :) On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Chip Childers

Re: [ASFCS40] New source code build available (4.0.0.beta6) for testing

2012-10-07 Thread Chip Childers
Thanks! - chip Sent from my iPhone. On Oct 7, 2012, at 2:51 PM, sebgoa wrote: > I just corrected a small typo on the test procedure, where we were checking > the md5 of tar.gz twice but not the md5 of the zip. > > > On Oct 6, 2012, at 2:53 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've post

Re: [ASFCS40] New source code build available (4.0.0.beta6) for testing

2012-10-07 Thread Chip Childers
No, we are trying to ship 4.0.0. Yes, we have it documented on the wiki (on my phone, so it's not easy to search for the url right now). The "beta" thing is a hack, as we've discussed on several threads now. - chip Sent from my iPhone. On Oct 7, 2012, at 2:55 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Chip,

Re: [ASFCS40] New source code build available (4.0.0.beta6) for testing

2012-10-07 Thread Noah Slater
Chip, Just to confirm, is 4.0.0.beta6 the official version number we want to ship? How will we increment this? What scheme are we using? Is it documented? On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > I've posted a new build (4.0.0.beta6) here: > http://people.apache.org/~c

Re: [ASFCS40] New source code build available (4.0.0.beta6) for testing

2012-10-07 Thread sebgoa
I just corrected a small typo on the test procedure, where we were checking the md5 of tar.gz twice but not the md5 of the zip. On Oct 6, 2012, at 2:53 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > I've posted a new build (4.0.0.beta6) here: > http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/cloudstack/4.0/ >

[ASFCS40] New source code build available (4.0.0.beta6) for testing

2012-10-05 Thread Chip Childers
Hi all, I've posted a new build (4.0.0.beta6) here: http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/cloudstack/4.0/ This code was taken from the 4.0 branch, commit 384c03e42578f17432a483d5828aad64175d9c49. Please test the build using our release test procedure documented here: https://cwiki.apache.org/