On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> BTW - if you publicize it on the blog, please be careful to state that
> this isn't an actual release yet.
+1
> +1 - Absolutely. IMO, once we get to a point where we are comfortable
> that the source code is correctly licensed, it's fa
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 12:04 PM
> To: Alex Huang; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [ASFCS40] Another source code bundle tomorrow...
>
> All (and Alex),
>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012, at 02:04 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> All (and Alex),
>>
>> I'll publish another source code package tomorrow. I'm still calling
>> it RCx (tomorrow is RC3) in the file names.
>
> Would it be possible to call it a beta,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012, at 02:04 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> All (and Alex),
>
> I'll publish another source code package tomorrow. I'm still calling
> it RCx (tomorrow is RC3) in the file names.
Would it be possible to call it a beta, or would that be too much work?
I'm going to put up a post on C
All (and Alex),
I'll publish another source code package tomorrow. I'm still calling
it RCx (tomorrow is RC3) in the file names.
Alex - Can you please make sure that the stuff I committed to master
makes it over to the 4.0 branch when you do the merge this afternoon?
If you can't get to the merg
