Re: 'traditional' workload patches

2012-12-04 Thread Marcus Sorensen
That's still the case, I'm not familiar enough with the XAPI to write the CitrixResource portion, but I imagine it would be next to trivial once all of the server portions are there and the KVM implementation is in place to use as a reference. That's assuming that resizing is actually exposed on th

Re: 'traditional' workload patches

2012-12-04 Thread Mice Xia
It's great. *resizeVolume* and *dynamicNicManmagement*, these features are very welcomed and i have seen a lot of use cases in traditional environment (pirvate cloud). By the way, what's the progress of *resizeVolume*? last time i saw it, it only supported KVM. -Mice 2012/12/4 Marcus Sorensen :

Re: 'traditional' workload patches

2012-12-04 Thread Bryan Whitehead
I'd like to see these and other API functions made available in the GUI. On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits wrote: > This sounds great, I would certainly use these enhanced API services for > persistent and semi-persistent infra. I can even see potential in elastic > situations

Re: 'traditional' workload patches

2012-12-03 Thread Kelceydamage@bbits
This sounds great, I would certainly use these enhanced API services for persistent and semi-persistent infra. I can even see potential in elastic situations to at-will modify these instance parameters. Thanks in advance! I really hope these get added into master. Sent from my iPhone On Dec