On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:02:57PM +0530, Pranav Saxena wrote:
> Moved both of them to 4.2.
Thanks, Pranav!
-chip
Moved both of them to 4.2.
Thanks,
Pranav
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 3:13 AM
To: Brian Federle
Cc: David Nalley; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Sonny Chhen
Subject: Re: '[PROPOSAL]' T
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:31:36PM -0800, Brian Federle wrote:
> The code is pretty much ready, I am just doing preliminary testing of it
> before I merge down. I should have it complete and in master by beginning of
> next week, including a basic tutorial on how to implement/install UI plugins.
The code is pretty much ready, I am just doing preliminary testing of it before
I merge down. I should have it complete and in master by beginning of next
week, including a basic tutorial on how to implement/install UI plugins.
Thanks,
Brian
On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:21 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> S
Sonny: et al:
I see work going on in the ui-plugins feature branch that I assume is
where this work is happening for this. What is the current status of
this work?
Thanks,
--David
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Sonny Chhen wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I would like to discuss a new feature that is
;Hugo Trippaers"
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: 星期五, 2012年 12 月 14日 下午 9:18:43
Subject: RE: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
Heya Sonny,
What kind of plugins would this be? I like the idea of being able to extend the
ui dynamically, but I fail to see the use case here.
Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 12:59 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
>
> Okay, but I'd like a way of distinguishing in speech and text this new way of
> ext
bject: Re: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
Isn't there a use case for a plugin that has both server and GUI components?
May be we should keep the name generic.
Thanks
Animesh
On Dec 13, 2012, at 5:08 PM, "Pranav Saxena" wrote:
> Yeah , we can pick different name
ack
architecture to new comers.
-Original Message-
From: Pranav Saxena
Sent: 14 December 2012 1:01 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Donal Lafferty
Subject: RE: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
Yeah , we can pick different names for each plugin . I am not sure if
afferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 3:53 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
>
> I've a question on terminology.
>
> Are these 'GUI plugins' going t
ranav
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 3:53 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
I've a question on terminology.
Are these 'GUI plugi
-Original Message-
From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com]
Sent: 13 December 2012 10:22 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
Currently , we haven't discussed access based scenario for a plugin . But yes ,
this wo
com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:46 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
This is a silly question, Do we allow all plugins to have same access role?
OR some plugins have admin access, and some plugins for users only?
Thanks,
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
Sonny
How does administrator enable/ disable the plugin if it is misbehaving because
of bug or let's say after upgrade?
> -Original Message-
> From: Fang Wang [mailto:fang.w.
: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
Does this require reboot of the management server?
> -Original Message-
> From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:16 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE:
Does this require reboot of the management server?
> -Original Message-
> From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:16 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugi
10:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
>
> I like the idea of the plugin button so users can see all the plugins.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sonny Chhen [mailto:sonny.ch...@citrix.com]
>
che.org
> Subject: RE: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
>
> I like the idea of the plugin button so users can see all the plugins.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sonny Chhen [mailto:sonny.ch...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 4:01 PM
>
I like the idea of the plugin button so users can see all the plugins.
-Original Message-
From: Sonny Chhen [mailto:sonny.ch...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 4:01 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Brian Federle; Pranav Saxena
Subject: '[PROPOSAL]&#
e.
Regards,
Pranav
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:29 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Brian Federle; Pranav Saxena
Subject: Re: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Sonny Chhen wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I would like to discuss a new feature that is being worked on for the next
> release of CloudStack. It is the ability to add third party plugins into
> CloudStack while still utilizing the current ui. The procedure in which thi
Hello All,
I would like to discuss a new feature that is being worked on for the next
release of CloudStack. It is the ability to add third party plugins into
CloudStack while still utilizing the current ui. The procedure in which this
would occur is as follows:
1. The developer will w
22 matches
Mail list logo
