RE: AutoScale feature....

2012-07-05 Thread Youcef Laribi
Thanks for the review Chiradeep and glad this cleared us earlier misunderstandings about this feature. Youcef -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 5:34 PM To: CloudStack DeveloperList Subject: Re: AutoScale feature

RE: AutoScale feature....

2012-07-03 Thread Youcef Laribi
; autoscale capability that NetScaler provides, so that CS users can take advantage of it when they are deploying with a NetScaler. We have gone to great lengths to make the API LoadBalancer-agnostic, to leave the door open for other loadbalancers who have a similar capability. Youcef -- Chiradeep

RE: AutoScale feature....

2012-07-03 Thread Youcef Laribi
ond proposal. Youcef -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 10:50 AM To: CloudStack DeveloperList Subject: Re: AutoScale feature On 7/2/12 11:43 PM, "Youcef Laribi" wrote: >In a nutshell, the framework

RE: AutoScale feature....

2012-07-03 Thread Youcef Laribi
>> 1. VM Counters that specify the monitored aspects of the VMs (some >> of these counters are monitored through SNMP agents running inside the > >VM- hence they are of the SNMP type) >This is specific to the implementation. There are several ways to monitor >performance. SNMP is just one

Re: AutoScale feature....

2012-07-02 Thread Youcef Laribi
In a nutshell, the framework is as follows: 1. VM Counters that specify the monitored aspects of the VMs (some of these counters are monitored through SNMP agents running inside the VM - hence they are of the SNMP type) 2. AutoScale Policy to express the low and high watermark thr