the network was not
observed anymore.
Thanks,
Salvatore Orlando
/
Testing
---
After observing crash while preparing the network on a physical network with
STT isolation method, components.xml.in was fixed. The CloudStack was then
re-built and re-deployed, and the crash while preparing the network was not
observed anymore.
Thanks,
Salvatore Orlando
n additional problem with implementing security
> groups using OVS: security groups are stateful firewalls, but there seems to
> be no obvious way to program a stateful firewall into OVS (unless you write a
> conntrack process that maintains the state with additional rules).
>
> --
>
ation with the
Cloudstack network manager.
Thanks,
Salvatore
> -Original Message-
> From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:salvatore.orla...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: 19 June 2012 09:22
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: SDN integration with CloudStack
>
>
+1 for introducing localized mailing lists.
I think this would be best trade-off between being able to actively involve
developers in different cultures and keeping a "global" mailing list in English.
English is not my first language either, but I guess I'm not at fault by
stating that it is by
com.cloud.network.PhysicalNetwork.IsolationMethod.
Otherwise, can I just checkout the Nicira-phase-1 branch on your github profile?
Thanks,
Salvatore
> -Original Message-
> From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:salvatore.orla...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: 18 June 2012 11:23
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.o
tion method to determine which Guru will
> respond. It would be nice if our ideas and code are more or less aligned.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:salvatore.orla...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 5
scarded by mail server, could you please post the
> content in mail?
>
> Please file a bug for this.
>
>
> Regards,
> Anthony
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:salvatore.orla...@eu.citrix.com]
> > Sent: Friday, Ju
2 and
> eth3
> for SSVM, if SSVM does need several IPs, all IPs should be configured on eth1
> if they are in the same subnet.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Anthony
>
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:sa
Hi,
We have a test environment where a basic zone is deployed.
Both system VMs and guest addresses are in the 192.168.0.0/16 subnet, even if
with distinct IP ranges.
We noticed that the SSVM is unable to download templates, as the connection
over the public interface (eth2) is suddenly dropped
Hugo,
The Email thread Alex was referring to is "Open vSwitch tunnel Manager (aka
Cloudstack SDN) - community feedback required!"
I actually started doing some work in this direction, but then focused on
something else.
My goal was to get rid of the global configuration flag, in my case
sdn.o
Hi,
IPv6 would be a dramatic improvement for Cloudstack networking, and I would
like to spend some dev cycles on it in the upcoming weeks.
However, "IPv6" is a fairly wide topic. So I would like to gather some feedback
from the community in order to understand what is a priority, what is a
"de
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: 08 May 2012 19:04
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Open vSwitch tunnel Manager (aka Cloudstack SDN) -
> community feedback required!
>
> > >I think it makes more sense to derive
> -Original Message-
> From: akaras...@gmail.com [mailto:akaras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Alex Karasulu
> Sent: 08 May 2012 14:48
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: E-Mail client guidelines on the mailing list
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Robert Schweikert
> it could let guest VMs which uses that network offering pick right network
> label (cloud-eth0/cloud-eth1). Please let me know if you need any other
> info.
>
> Thanks,
> SWAMY
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:salvatore.orla...@eu.citri
Hi,
If I define two physical networks for a zone, say Phy1 and Phy2, can I have
distinct guest traffic labels on each network?
If yes (which I doubt), how can I specify that a logical network should be
built using a particular guest traffic label.
Regards,
Salvatore
Hi all!
As some of you already know, a feature for creating L2-in-L3 guest networks was
recently pushed in the master branch.
For more information on this feature, please check the specification:
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/QA/Open+vSwitch+Tunnel+Manager
I would like to ask your feedback
I believe it is used as a default setting for all clusters in the zone.
But then you are still free to override that setting for specific clusters.
Salvatore
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:kevin.kl...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 02 May 2012 14:06
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.a
erged in master and 3.0.x
>
> Cool! I'm going to be on basic networking for a few months so not quite
> ready to try it, but will this eventually support KVM?
>
> John
>
> On Apr 23, 2012, at 6:08 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just a
`, `network_id`, `key`,
`port_name`, `state`) VALUES (0, 0, 0, 0, 'lock', 'SUCCESS');
Finally, it is quite likely you'll find something which is not working
properly! If that is the case, please file an issue on jira.cloudstack.org and
assign it to either me (Salvatore Orlando) or Chiradeep Vittal. Please also
specify "Network Controller" as the affected component.
Salvatore
seems that the DatabaseUpgradeChecker looks at latest available upgrade class
and at current code version, therefore not looking at the database at all.
Changing the patch version to '3' solves this problem, apparently.
Salvatore
From: Kevin Kluge
Sent: 23 April 2012 16:57
To: Salvato
21 matches
Mail list logo
