I've noticed that some of the projects separate discussions between dev
and general administrative items via a general@ and a dev@ list. For
example, the last email I sent was about project meta-data. It's not
specifically about developing cloudstack, but about managing our
community activities.
Hi all,
As we work through graduation, we will be transitioning from the
incubators status file [1] to a PMC rdf [2] and project DOAP file [3] to track
our project's info.
I've taken a first stab at both (pmc descriptor at [4], and doap file at
[5]).
Take a look and let me know if you have any c
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:06:31PM -0400, David Grizzanti wrote:
> Chip/David,
>
> Sounds good to me. I've seen emails in the past that go to both lists (-dev
> and -users). In this case would it be a good idea to draft an email per
> topic and send out 1 email that copies both lists?
I'd jus
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 02:23:33PM -0700, Alex Huang wrote:
> > My take on this is that we shouldn't do anything to 4.1 The people that
> > matter (users) are taken care of when they start the MS - and that is a
> > well-
> > tested path.
> > The only visible benefit for 4.1 is for developers/QA -
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:52:26PM -0700, Manan Shah wrote:
> I have updated the JIRA ticket as well as the requirements document.
>
> Update the requirements to mention:
>
> 1. Made the feature requirements broader by covering all Hypervisors and
> not just VMWare
> 2. Mentioned that the origina
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 02:41:01PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> We have 1 blocker and 4 critical defects on baremetal
>
> CLOUDSTACK-1610 Baremetal API addBaremetalPxeKickStartServer fail to
> prepare PXE server causing create instance with Kickstart style image to fail
>
> CLOUDSTA
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:42:17PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:26:50AM -0700, Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote:
> >> Hi Chip, Prasanna,
> >>
> >> Yes, the change is pretty st
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:31:05PM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote:
> Murali,
>
> Fix for CLOUDSTACK-1664 has not made it to 4.1 yet.
It is there in 4.1 now.
git am. Not sure what
was going wrong.
commit ebc10b6bf01ce4c0874ff59fd8731b75dc64304f
Author: Kelven Yang
Date: Thu Mar 21 00:50:31 2013 +
CLOUDSTACK-1568,CLOUDSTACK-1664: Fix ActionEvent interception and optimize
@DB lookup with caching
Signed-off-by: Chip Childers
- Chip
the above two defects and other packaging related issues.
Signed-off-by: Chip Childers
- Chip Childers
On March 20, 2013, 6:37 p.m., Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail.
since authentication passes through
> all the authenticators available in the UserAuthenticator list until one of
> them succeeds or all fail.
>
> Regards,
> Vijay
Does everyone believe that this is a valid change for 4.1? Or should we
wait for 4.2 or 4.1.1?
>
>
&
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:43:30AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> Chip,
>
> By reading Rohit's email and wiki, I understood current situation on
> this
> issue. Unlike I previously understood, this DB issue not only happens on
> dev environment, but also happens on QA/production environment as we
Hi all,
A quick update... the board has *passed* our graduation resolution. We
are now a TLP. Congratulations! Awesome work everyone!
We are going to have to work through some infra related changes before
we make the official announcement to the world (i.e.: those that are not
on this mailing
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:36:10PM +0530, prasanna wrote:
> Is this a new feature or did I miss the discussion around this?
It seems to be a straight forward change, but what's the reasoning for
this Venkata?
Are the upgrade scenarios considered here?
>
> On 20 March 2013 10:33, Venkata Siva Vi
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:08:01AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> I created this bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1747
> because I noticed yesterday in dev setup that after running mvn -P developer
> -pl developer –Ddeploydb, my DB is still at 4.0 version, not expected
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:08:01AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> I created this bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1747
> because I noticed yesterday in dev setup that after running mvn -P developer
> -pl developer –Ddeploydb, my DB is still at 4.0 version, not expected
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:52:34PM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
>
> The template_s3_ref table definition is no longer in the create-schema.sql
> script. Without this table, the S3-backed secondary storage feature will not
> function. I have created CLOUDSTACK-1745 [1] to track resolution
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 04:57:58AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have been committing the translations to the 4.1 branch.
>
> There is an issue with authorship of the translations.
>
> Translators submit translations of strings via a site called transifex. A
> documentation
ssion (per topic) on the dev list. We can also consider asking
for content reviews from cloustack-users@i.a.o, given that best
practices, choosing a HV, etc... are all things the the user
community may be qualified to help with.
Sound OK?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Chip Childers
Jessica / Radhika,
Can you answer any of David's questions?
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 04:04:45PM -0400, David Grizzanti wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm looking to convert a few of the leftover sections of the Install Guide
> (pre-Apache) into XML and incorporate into the new documentation format.
> Ou
that via an
actual merge from your feature branch?
- Chip Childers
On March 20, 2013, 1:43 a.m., Murali Reddy wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:45:19AM +, Murali Reddy wrote:
> I would like to merge GSLB feature proposed [1] and developed in the feature
> branch [2] into master. Code for this feature pretty much conforms to what
> was proposed in FS [3]. I added unit tests for all the new service layer
> m
- Chip Childers
On March 20, 2013, 9:43 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10010/#review18153
---
Ship it!
applied to 4.1
- Chip Childers
On March 20, 2013, 6:21
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10042/
---
(Updated March 20, 2013, 3:39 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Joe Brock
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 09:16:38PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote:
> You are right . This bug exists in 4.1 due to the string sanitization
> check-ins which went in . Just need to cherry pick one commit from master to
> address this issue .
>
> Chip - if you could cherry pick up this commit
> -345
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10036/#review18133
---
Ship it!
applied to 4.1 and master. thanks
- Chip Childers
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10022/#review18126
---
Ship it!
Committed. Thanks for the patch!
- Chip Childers
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9923/#review18125
---
Ship it!
Committed. Thanks for the patch!
- Chip Childers
On
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 01:23:20PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
> Here are the open items marked for 4.1 branch,
>
> Review ID Submitter People
> Bugs
> 10008 rohityadav chip.childers
> CLOU
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:02:01PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So - as you all know, we're on the agenda for tomorrow for the board to
> vote on graduation. It's not a done deal, but we should be prepared for
> the word tomorrow that we've graduated and it's time to move on out of
Hi all,
It appears that CLOUDSTACK-590 is specific to devcloud. Can someone
please take a look?
John - if this isn't resolved, do you agree that it's not critical for
the product release itself (i.e.: devcloud is a dev tool only)? If so,
we should consider downgrading it to Major.
-chip
Wido,
Can you take a look at CLOUDSTACK-1469 please? It got re-opened.
-chip
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:52:30AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> Chip, David do we have a shared filter for release defects? That will avoid
> any confusion in interpretation of what is being targeted for a release. From
> Sudha's list below I don't think it picked up the "Affected version"
response.
When you have resolved this problem run "git am --resolved".
If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am --skip".
To restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am --abort".
- Chip Childers
On March 19, 2013, 1
bring it
into 4.1.
- Chip Childers
On March 19, 2013, 12:33 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 5:51 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Please update status on blockers and critical bu
appropriately.
- Chip Childers
On March 19, 2013, 11:38 a.m., Kishan Kavala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
ng
awsapi.
Signed-off-by: Chip Childers
- Chip Childers
On March 19, 2013, 10:36 a.m., Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://revi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10003/#review18085
---
Ship it!
Applied to 4.1 branch.
- Chip Childers
On March 19
.
If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am --skip".
To restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am --abort".
- Chip Childers
On March 19, 2013, 5:01 p.m., Kelven Yang wrote:
>
> ---
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10001/
---
(Updated March 19, 2013, 5:01 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9989/#review18081
---
Ship it!
applied to master - thanks for the patch!
- Chip Childers
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9772/#review18080
---
Ship it!
Pushed to 4.1. Thanks for the patch!
- Chip Childers
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:34:56PM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Since It's almost the first time we do this, I would suggest to post the docs
> in the translated language (PS: remember they are incomplete), and then we
> can file bugs for missing strings or wrong translations.
+1
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:24:35PM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:03:37AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013, at 08:56 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> >>>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:03:37AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013, at 08:56 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> > Radhika,
> >
> > The 22nd was the date that we were going to cut our first RC... So I
> > think we're going to go with what we have.
>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:33:08PM +, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Chip - Thanks for looking into this. Please find my answers inline.
>
> On 18/03/13 10:34 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> >Nitin,
> >
> >A couple of notes:
> >
> >1 - The license h
Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 6:37 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Developers
> Cc: Chip Childers
> Subject: [ACS41][DOCS]updating pots and po files
>
> Chip,
>
> I am ready to update the /docs/pot directory and download the po
Rohit,
The ASF is participating. It's being coordinated via the
dev@community.a.o list
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201303.mbox/browser).
If we want to have an opportunity to interest participants, someone
needs to follow up on that thread to figure out what we need to
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 04:53:38PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>> 3.0.2 was the last version of CloudStack in the 3.0.x line. I don't
>> think the 3.0.x branch exists in the git repo anymore, but there's
>>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 04:53:38PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> 3.0.2 was the last version of CloudStack in the 3.0.x line. I don't
> think the 3.0.x branch exists in the git repo anymore, but there's
> likely a source tarball still living on sourceforge.
>
> --David
origin/3.0.x is in the repo.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:14:17PM -0700, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Already committed to master.
>
>
>
> Commit hash:d9b85e397d10f2291058ff972094decd8fc4ad7d
>
>
>
> --
>
> CLOUDSTACK-1706 Failed to deploy VM with error "cannot find
> DeployPlannerSelector"
>
>
>
> Changes:
>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:35:33PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote:
> Hi Chip ,
>
> I guess there was a discussion about the reason behind not having unit tests
> for this feature now -
> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201301.mbox/%3c97f4356aea71904482cd192135c038f
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Pranav Saxena wrote:
> The AWS health Check feature backend code has been merged into master . The
> patch applied cleanly and the RAT build was successful . I'll be soon merging
> the UI support for this feature as well.
Rajesh and Pranav,
I don't see any unit
Hi all,
We're getting close to our scheduled RC (Friday!).
Below is the list of current unresolved critical and blocker bugs for 4.1.
Can those in the assignee field please take a moment to make sure that
you have an updated status on the bug-fix efforts please?
Also, if I've missed committing
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 04:10:25PM +, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> I would like to merge scale up vm functionality branch to master
>
> Spec :
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dynamic+scaling+of+CPU+and+RAM
>
> JIRA ticket :
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6
One more update, for those that aren't on the cloudstack-marketing@i.a.o
list.
The board has us on the agenda for Wednesday's meeting. We'll know soon
after the meeting if we have graduated, and we've kicked off discussions
on the marketing list to get a press release ready (along with other
mark
An update on the graduation process... We just passed the IPMC vote.
We are now waiting to see which board meeting our proposed resolution
will fit into, and the result of that meeting's discussion.
-chip
- Forwarded message from Chip Childers -
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:22:10PM -0500, George Reese wrote:
> But the ID of the network is 517653f6-312c-4616-88cb-22620f3f75dd. My point
> is that the information is confusing to anyone who doesn't know the
> CloudStack history.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1702
Thanks fo
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:08:39PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hey Chip,
>
> Do you know where I could find documentation on how to create this kind of
> CS plug-in?
>
> Thanks!
The wiki has some information, which you should try to search for
answers to questions like this. Raise questions
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Jessica Tomechak
wrote:
> CLOUDSTACK-1409, Troubleshooting, I'm leaving at 4.1 because it would be so
> awesome. This could start as a small job. The XML files from the older docs
> are already available on reviewboard. Just avoid the parts where reviewers
> raised
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 07:59:24PM +0530, Kausal Malladi wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to create a CloudStack plugin. Can anyone help me with
> necessary steps to be followed to accomplish it?
>
> Thanks.
> Kausal Malladi
> www.kausalmalladi.tk
>
Can you be more specific about the type of plugin you
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:50:51AM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Also, just so I can picture what we're talking about when we say "extending
> the CS API:" Does this mean an admin or end user could invoke my new APIs
> just like they were invoking any other CS API?
That's exactly what it means!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9956/#review18028
---
Ship it!
pushed to 4.1 and master
- Chip Childers
On March 15
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9978/#review18027
---
Ship it!
pushed to 4.1 branch
- Chip Childers
On March 15, 2013
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013, at 04:15 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013, at 09:32 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> > > Anyone want to take this on? I think that the recent discussions that
> > > Ilya brought up around marketing might be a good way to ge
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 04:40:04PM +0530, Sailaja Mada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried database comparison between 4.1 new installation vs upgrade from 4.0
> to 4.1.
>
> There are 6 tables that are not available with upgraded setup when compare to
> 4.1 newly installation.
>
>
> 1) data_store_
> >>>>addresses upgrades, i.e. does it still allow existing definitions to
> >>>>be wiped, or will those be forever stuck. I haven't even looked yet.
> >>>>
> >>>>Essentially, the bug is that if a KVM host is uncleanly shut down,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9860/#review17976
---
also, what's the bug ID?
- Chip Childers
On March 15, 2013,
still
required?
- Chip Childers
On March 15, 2013, 1:59 p.m., Kelven Yang wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apach
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9860/
---
(Updated March 15, 2013, 1:59 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9905/#review17940
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chip Childers
On March 13, 2013, 5:37 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9905/#review17939
---
pushed to 4.1
- Chip Childers
On March 13, 2013, 5:37 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9894/#review17938
---
Anthony - Did you actually commit this?
- Chip Childers
On March
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7594/#review17937
---
Ship it!
I applied this to master.
- Chip Childers
On Feb. 27
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9924/#review17935
---
Ship it!
Applied to 4.1 and master.
- Chip Childers
On March 15
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9924/
---
(Updated March 15, 2013, 1:12 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:52:36AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> David
>
> Please mark patch as submitted
I took care of that.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf
> > Of Prasanna Santhanam
> > Sent: Wednesday, February
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:04:27PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> Wido, Noa
>
> Any updates on this patch. We are closing on 4.1 so appreciate early response
>
> Animesh
Wido got this to me - I just pushed to 4.1.
>
> > -Original Message-
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 01:29:48PM -0700, Sheng Yang wrote:
> Already checked in MASTER.
>
> commit 98291d043de47ef6c07aca3d1d31464f6a87
> Author: Sheng Yang
> Date: Wed Mar 13 17:02:19 2013 -0700
>
> CLOUDSTACK-1218: Use the first IP in the first vlan range for VR
> in shared network
packages.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander
- Chip Childers
On March 15, 2013, 1:03 a.m., Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apach
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9910/
---
(Updated March 15, 2013, 1:03 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip
it's committed to 4.1
please.
Has this been tested on master?
- Chip Childers
On March 13, 2013, 12:46 p.m., Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://rev
pluggable service. A
minor issue, but the listApis won't list the "listApis" API itself.
So, we manually addAll getCommands() from the class to the cmdClass (the
list of cmd classes)
Signed-off-by: Chip Childers
- Chip Childers
On March 14, 2013, 1:4
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 04:26:33PM +0530, Srikanteswararao Talluri wrote:
> This mail is regarding "support for storage motion on VMware". It was
> mentioned before that the same FS as
> xenmotion-https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Enabling+Storage+XenMotion+for+XenServer
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9879/#review17909
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chip Childers
On March 13, 2013, 6:11 a.m
r the patch!
- Chip Childers
On March 13, 2013, 6:11 a.m., Hongtu Zang wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:52:27PM -0700, d...@soleks.com wrote:
> Hi All,
> Today i got the following problem. I have servers with 4x2Ghz CPUs, so it was
> reasonable for me to create computational offers like 1x2GHz, 2x2GHz etc. But
> i failed to deploy VMs using that offers. The reason was - a
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:42:55PM -0800, Alex Huang wrote:
> With the discussion in the BVT thread and other evidence from the check-ins,
> I think there are some confusion on when to and what to write in a unit test.
>
> Unit tests are a philosophy thing and I usually stay away from things like
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:28:55PM -0700, John Kinsella wrote:
> I've fixed several bugs in security_group.py in the last few days. Would be
> nice if we could get this into 4.1.
Ack and pushed. Can you please resolve all relevant bugs?
>
> commit 381f737e64ed9192e6eea4aeffe1920637f7d835
> Aut
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 08:58:23PM -0700, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> I'd update the building with maven section on cwiki. but I dont know how to
> describe the impatient profile, beyond 'it pleases alex'.
+1 to adding this to the wiki (and +1 to Alex explaining himself!)
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 06:18:30PM -0700, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Patch: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9917/
>
>
> Fix for CLOUDSTACK-1604: deploy VM failed when global setting
> "vm.allocation.algorithm" is set to "userdispersing"
>
>
>
Ack - this was pushed.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 04:46:44PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Tested the commit against 4.0 branch, 4.1 branch, and master dev
> environments. Successfully deployed zones with local and NFS primary
> storage, to the point of instances, then rebooted KVM host, and
> everything came back up. Ask
e bug, and the bug
is resolved as "Can't reproduce".
Is this change already in master?
Thanks!
- Chip Childers
On March 14, 2013, 7:17 p.m., Kelven Yang wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9888/
---
(Updated March 14, 2013, 7:17 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9917/#review17905
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chip Childers
On March 14, 2013, 1:17 a.m
Damle
>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:43 AM
>> To: Chip Childers; David Nalley
>> Cc: cloudstack; Prachi Damle
>> Subject: Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1604: deploy VM failed when
>> global setti
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> The vote is now closed and has passed. I will start the IPMC vote on
> general@i.a.o now. Thanks to everyone for their expression of support
> for our community!
IPMC vote running now:
http://markmail.org/message/5v4znxvilfngv
The vote is now closed and has passed. I will start the IPMC vote on
general@i.a.o now. Thanks to everyone for their expression of support
for our community!
Results:
+1: 55
+0: none
-1: none
The following individuals have voted +1:
Mohammad Nour El-Din (IPMC/mentor)
Noah Slater (IPMC/me
1 - 100 of 2392 matches
Mail list logo
