[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam updated CLOUDSTACK-963:
--
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> [cloud.utils.AnnotationHelper] class j
Prasanna Santhanam created CLOUDSTACK-963:
-
Summary: [cloud.utils.AnnotationHelper] class
java.lang.Stringdoes not have a Table annotation
Key: CLOUDSTACK-963
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CL
Okay, so we can do two things have a set of offerings provided via
devcloud/devcloud-kvm.sql or users are free to create their own offerings.
We can add the small/med/large offerings such as 1/5/10GB offerings (local and
nfs) or as you need them in the sql, commit ftw!
Regards.
_
Yes I will include docs as well.
Thanks
Animesh
On Jan 11, 2013, at 7:03 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>
>> Animesh,
>>
>> Can you also work with Jessica on any potential issues on docs? She noted
>> something in the original thread.
>>
>> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551795#comment-13551795
]
deepti dohare commented on CLOUDSTACK-818:
--
Having a private zone per domain
Thanks. It was our playing with making the volume integration test work
that brought the issue up. Will be nice to have these in place.
On Jan 11, 2013 7:50 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>
> On 11-Jan-2013, at 5:23 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
> > I was playing with the latest master and noticed that
On Jan 11, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Animesh,
>
> Can you also work with Jessica on any potential issues on docs? She noted
> something in the original thread.
>
> --Alex
>
+1 to that please. Docs are really no different from code in this respect.
>> -Original Message-
>>
On 11-Jan-2013, at 5:23 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> I was playing with the latest master and noticed that extractVolume was
> throwing a null pointer exception on getting the zone id. I'm headed
> somewhere but thought I'd mention it because it looked like it could
> involve the identity mapper
Oh man, yes it was from a regression from removing IdentityProxy with
EntityManager.
Will push the fix right away. Thanks for the heads up.
Regards.
On 11-Jan-2013, at 5:23 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> I was playing with the latest master and noticed that extractVolume was
> throwing a null po
Thanks Alex! You gotta preach us there is a lot of code and design ideas that
we don't understand, we can only learn from our masters and our mistakes :P
Regards.
On 11-Jan-2013, at 5:03 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Oh mannow, you're going to get me started on something that you don't
> want t
Oh mannow, you're going to get me started on something that you don't want
to get me started onbut here goes my preaching...
Adding checks where the business logic does not dictate it to avoid exceptions
is something that you should never do. So what do I mean by this? Take this
examp
I think 30GB is fine for devcloud given the 50MB tinylinux. I just wanted
the disk offerings in the zone to work with that.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Yes just sql changes, no change possible for that in devcloud. If one
> wants more disk space, they can resize vmdk an
Does anyone happen to know the reason for this build failure?
Mvn -e install
[INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:compile {execution: default-compile}]
[INFO] Compiling 149 source files to
/home/anthony/vmops/incubator-cloudstack/utils/target/classes
[INFO]
In GenericDaoBase's findById and findByUuid if I added a check to return null
if passed value is null to avoid potential exceptions, will this break any use
case? No changes I found till now.
@@ -905,6 +905,8 @@ public abstract class GenericDaoBase implements Gene
public T findById(final ID
Yes just sql changes, no change possible for that in devcloud. If one wants
more disk space, they can resize vmdk and resizefs on devcloud and reboot.
Current disk size is 30GB, do you want this to be extended? I think it should
be sufficient for a small datacenter use case on basic zone on one's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551702#comment-13551702
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-865:
Yes, api_refactoring was mostly inter
Animesh,
Can you also work with Jessica on any potential issues on docs? She noted
something in the original thread.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 4:02 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551689#comment-13551689
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-815:
-
There is no admin guide doc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551691#comment-13551691
]
Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
Ok, thanks.
P.S.
This error oc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551687#comment-13551687
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-816:
-
As far as I know, there is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551684#comment-13551684
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-817:
-
There is no documentation y
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551682#comment-13551682
]
Min Chen commented on CLOUDSTACK-865:
-
Yes, this refactoring is just internal opti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551680#comment-13551680
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-818:
-
Don't believe there is any
I started a separate thread [IP Clearance] Potential issues. The first post has
summary of potential issues, please review
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 2:43 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sub
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551674#comment-13551674
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
Got it. Mgmt server works well as far a
Folks
I wanted to keep folks updated on where we are with IP clearance on the
different issues and starting this new thread
Here is the list of potential issues that has been identified. Please bring in
any other issue if you think it needs to go through IP clearance. I will start
individual t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551667#comment-13551667
]
Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
I restarted the VPC and attache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard Shevel updated CLOUDSTACK-938:
--
Attachment: after_restart_VPC.zip
> s2s VPN trouble
> ---
>
>
Ok...I think that's perhaps a little more than news. At least, I was
originally thinking something along the lines of what were the major points
discussed on the list for people who can't read the mailing list for a living
like I am. :)
Although I wouldn't mind a whole different site for some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551663#comment-13551663
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-830:
-
This is a small change to t
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Isolation+based+on+Security+Groups+in+Advance+zone
This is upgraded spec ,
Compared to original one, following are major changes
1. SG enabled is zone wide parameter, if this zone is SG enabled, all guest
networks in this zone must be SG
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551660#comment-13551660
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-833:
-
Trivial doc change. In the
We may also want to consider adjusting the disk offering sizes in devcloud,
we fail test_01_create_volume because (among other things) there is not
100GB available to create a volume, as it tests all known disk offerings.
Maybe have small/med/large be 5GB, 10GB, 15GB. That's probably for the sql?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551658#comment-13551658
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
OK, here is what's wrong.
Jan 10 10:28
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551656#comment-13551656
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-864:
-
I might have some existing
+1 Let's do it.
Should we have a website for it (or a section on
incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/*) instead of wiki (while wiki won't require
any infra), like a newsletter, feed or blog?
Contributors can be invited to post experience on their work, discuss ideas and
we can interview people on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551646#comment-13551646
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-865:
-
What documentation is wante
Innocent question, bare with me: These bits which we're discussing that were
developed outside the ASF repo - they weren't distributed in CloudPlatform with
an ASF copyright header, were they?
On Jan 11, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Jessica Tomechak
wrote:
> The email below suggests all contributions sh
The admin version of the stop command has a forced flag you can set. Forced
doesn't mean that CloudStack has some special way to stop the vm but is a way
to tell cloudstack that the VM is actually stopped, just reset and release
resources.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Willia
Alright! Will do that soon and upload the new image on
http://people.apache.org/~bhaisaab/cloudstack/devcloud/
For now you can simply edit /etc/exports, add /opt/storage/primary for primary
nfs and restart nfs server. This will work.
Anyone wants to recommend installing/updating any package/sett
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard Shevel updated CLOUDSTACK-938:
--
Attachment: r-292-vm_log.tar.gz
> s2s VPN trouble
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551644#comment-13551644
]
Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
i made /var/log archive from r-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551642#comment-13551642
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-867:
-
Not sure if I am the right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jessica Tomechak reassigned CLOUDSTACK-867:
---
Assignee: (was: Jessica Tomechak)
> Document Scaling up CPU and R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jessica Tomechak reassigned CLOUDSTACK-836:
---
Assignee: (was: Jessica Tomechak)
> [DOC] Document the SNMP OIDs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551638#comment-13551638
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-836:
-
Not sure I am the right per
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551636#comment-13551636
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-866:
-
I have worked on API docs f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jessica Tomechak reassigned CLOUDSTACK-871:
---
Assignee: (was: Jessica Tomechak)
> Document VM's base image upda
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551634#comment-13551634
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-871:
-
Not sure whether this shoul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-299:
--
Description:
Support adding Egress firewall rules functionality for guest n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551630#comment-13551630
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
oh, sorry, got the wrong log...
But th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551631#comment-13551631
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-923:
-
I have some existing docume
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551629#comment-13551629
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-829:
-
I have some existing docume
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551626#comment-13551626
]
Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
in the log it says that it is r
The email below suggests all contributions should be made available for IP
clearance and community acceptance in some well-known location. Also, it
suggests that all existing documentation for the proposed contributions should
be similarly available.
I have some documentation that was written o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551622#comment-13551622
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
this message doesn't match r-292-VM. Yo
I have updated QA test plan [1] with milestones in project plan format. Let me
know if any clarification is needed. I will update this frequently if there are
changes to the plan/milestones. There are a few stories already done, QA can
post test plans to dev ML for review and get started on t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard Shevel reopened CLOUDSTACK-687:
---
> s2s VPN error
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-687
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551619#comment-13551619
]
Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-687:
---
Hello Jessica.
I'm attached cli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard Shevel updated CLOUDSTACK-687:
--
Attachment: client.tar.gz
> s2s VPN error
> --
>
>
This might help:
http://git-scm.com/2010/03/08/rerere.html
On 1/11/13 1:16 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote:
>The problem with these reverts is that I've already pulled them into
>javelin when we started the merge. I'm not sure what to do now because
>they are quite large and complicated to unwind.
>
>A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551614#comment-13551614
]
Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
Yep, /var/log/messages from VR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard Shevel updated CLOUDSTACK-938:
--
Attachment: messages
> s2s VPN trouble
> ---
>
> Ke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551613#comment-13551613
]
Animesh Chaturvedi commented on CLOUDSTACK-306:
---
Aprrox contribution siz
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> As suggested by community Citrix will go through IP clearance process. I am
> updating identified defects with more contextual information and will
> summarize in this thread once I am done. The list is longer than originally
> ident
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:20:49PM -0800, John Kinsella wrote:
> Everyone - as we're trying to define the ACS security response plan, we
> started considering the idea of a pre-disclosure mailing list. Membership
> would consist of security teams from organizations that have large
> installations o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551601#comment-13551601
]
Animesh Chaturvedi commented on CLOUDSTACK-297:
---
This seems to have foll
Everyone - as we're trying to define the ACS security response plan, we started
considering the idea of a pre-disclosure mailing list. Membership would consist
of security teams from organizations that have large installations of ACS upon
which their business is critical. The idea was based on X
As suggested by community Citrix will go through IP clearance process. I am
updating identified defects with more contextual information and will
summarize in this thread once I am done. The list is longer than originally
identified. This is obviously an important lesson and hopefully we will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers resolved CLOUDSTACK-933.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Assignee: Noa Resare
Reviewb
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8908/#review15282
---
Ship it!
Thanks for the patch!
commit 1033200b0b5943cc21d5397d12d3b
Nice! That's exactly what I was thinking when I added the news page! Thanks
Joe!
Can we have the news items be in reverse order, with the newest highest?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 9:07 AM
> To: CloudSta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jessica Wang resolved CLOUDSTACK-687.
-
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Richard,
I'm unable to reproduce this bug on my machine
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551544#comment-13551544
]
Animesh Chaturvedi edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-774 at 1/11/13 9:51 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551546#comment-13551546
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
ethnull has nothing to do with VPN, it'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551544#comment-13551544
]
Animesh Chaturvedi edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-774 at 1/11/13 9:49 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551544#comment-13551544
]
Animesh Chaturvedi commented on CLOUDSTACK-774:
---
The code does not exist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-774:
--
Description:
Supporting kickstart install for RedHat like Linux in CloudSta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-774:
--
Description:
Supporting kickstart install for RedHat like Linux in CloudSta
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 12:10 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:40 PM, David Nalley wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Brockmeier resolved CLOUDSTACK-961.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with commit 92d4b2143f0e3f144106054f3f2446fbba28add4.
Yes, I see that it's currently hosted on people.apache.org, and I assumed
you'd know how to replace it. This would help a lot. Thanks
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Cool, let's do both and have primary nfs and local storage. While having
> local storage will be better for
Not needed, devcloud is just a host+nfs replacement all in a box, what we
should version integration tests should be against xen(xcp)/kvm version (i.e.
host version).
I think goal should be latest integration tests on master should work on latest
devcloud.
Regards.
_
The problem with these reverts is that I've already pulled them into javelin
when we started the merge. I'm not sure what to do now because they are quite
large and complicated to unwind.
Any suggestions?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.
Do you want to put a pointer to the CCC youtube channel?
On 1/11/13 9:06 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote:
>Hey all,
>
>In the distant past (I think it was October. What? Things move fast
>around here.) we had a discussion about doing a CloudStack weekly news
>type thing.
>
>I'd like to start doing t
Donal,
Forgive the forward from -users to -dev. How's this work going? Is
there something that the community can help review / comment on?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Donal Lafferty
Date: Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:20 AM
Subject: RE: CloudStack Hyper V support
To: Pranav Saxena
Should we version the integration tests against the devcloud version?
On 1/11/13 1:07 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>Cool, let's do both and have primary nfs and local storage. While having
>local storage will be better for vm life cycle.
>Yes, let's do this. Marcus, do you want me to create a new im
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Cool, let's do both and have primary nfs and local storage. While having
> local storage will be better for vm life cycle.
> Yes, let's do this. Marcus, do you want me to create a new image with these
> changes? I can do that this weekend.
+
Cool, let's do both and have primary nfs and local storage. While having local
storage will be better for vm life cycle.
Yes, let's do this. Marcus, do you want me to create a new image with these
changes? I can do that this weekend.
Regards.
From: Marcus
I'm going to wait on the reverts for CLOUDSTACK-306 and CLOUDSTACK-312
On 1/11/13 12:15 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote:
>> +1 - with an assumption that Alex and others are OK with it (since the
>> javelin branch merge was proposed first).
>
>+1 We're struggling with the merge right now so one more merge
Great, thanks, Marcus.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Looks like with iSCSI you give it the dns name of your target, the IQN, and
> the lun #. Presuably it sets up an SR from that lun and carves volumes out
> of that, similar to how the CLVM works. Or maybe it puts a f
For those interested, I found a way around this.
1) I made sure that all of the instances that were in an endless stopping
state were indeed stopped.
2) Logged into the mysql db as root and selected the cloud db
3) Ran sql: update vm_instance set state = 'Stopped' where id = ;
4) Went to the MS in
Looks like with iSCSI you give it the dns name of your target, the IQN, and
the lun #. Presuably it sets up an SR from that lun and carves volumes out
of that, similar to how the CLVM works. Or maybe it puts a filesystem on it
and mounts it, not sure.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Marcus Sorens
Edison,
I think we are speaking past each other a bit. My intention is to separate
logical and physical storage operations in order to simplify the implementation
of new storage providers. Also, in order to support the widest range of
storage mechanisms, I want to eliminate all interface assu
OK, thanks, guys!
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:15 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Another newbie question for you.
> >
> > So, presumably features that are intended for a given release are listed
> > and tracked (progress
On the KVM side, you can do NFS, Local disk storage, CLVM (shared block
device that has Clustered LVM on top of it, a primary pool is a particular
volume group and cloudstack carves out logical volumes out of it as
needed), and RBD (RADOS Block devices, Ceph shared storage. You point it at
your clu
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Another newbie question for you.
>
> So, presumably features that are intended for a given release are listed
> and tracked (progress toward completion) somewhere. Can someone tell me
> where and/or what tool we use to do t
> +1 - with an assumption that Alex and others are OK with it (since the
> javelin branch merge was proposed first).
+1 We're struggling with the merge right now so one more merge is not going to
hurt very much.
--Alex
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Another newbie question for you.
>
> So, presumably features that are intended for a given release are listed
> and tracked (progress toward completion) somewhere. Can someone tell me
> where and/or what tool we use to do t
So, being new to CloudStack, I'm not sure what kind of storage protocols
are currently supported in the product. To my knowledge, NFS shares are
what CloudStack has only supported in the past. Does CloudStack support
iSCSI targets at present?
Thanks!
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Mike Tutko
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
