RE: Cloudstack 4 Templates

This is the systemvm template for cloudstack 4.0(for VMWare) http://download.cloud.com/templates/burbank/burbank-systemvm-08012012.ova You can use the above template to bring up system VM not Guest VMs. Please refer to the following link for documentation: http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack

Cloudstack 4 Templates

Hi, I want to register a template in Cloudstack 4 client console. I want the ova file downloadable link for VMWare. This template will be used for creating a VM on the cluster host. I saw in the Cloudstack 3.0 documentation that for vmware system template link is http://download.cloud.com/templat

RE: [PROPOSAL] Raise cluster size limit to 16 on VMware

Hi Koushik, I have a question/concern - The "limitations" are multi-dimensional - for example, vSphere 5.0 clusters hosting linked clone pools are limited to 8 ESXi hosts when using VMFS datastores and 32 ESXi hosts when using only NFS datastores. In 5.1, they made both 32 hosts. I think 4.0 h

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-409) ThreadLocal Transaction and its db connection got reset for user managed db connnection, causing ClusterHeartBeat thread frequently trying to get db connection.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Min Chen resolved CLOUDSTACK-409. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed through patch https://reviews.apache.org/r/7726/ > T

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-936) ASF master nonoss build failed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Min Chen resolved CLOUDSTACK-936. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed by commit dcbb0ecef53644373ea9345959e754cdeb7526a7 >

RE: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology

Hi Devdeep, What is the difference between 1 and 3 below? Look same to me. These assumptions seem fair to me. I think the code name you refer to below for the attestation server is Intel internal codename - I'm not sure if we should be referring by this name.. Hari -Original Message-

RE: [DISCUSS] IP Address Reservation within a network

Using VLSM at the zone creation the admin can create multiple subnets from a parent subnet, but that is not what we are targeting at. CloudStack admin should not be interested to create a subnet for Non CloudStack hosts IMHO. This particular requirement is to only have a definite subnet for Cloud

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-714) S3-based secondary Storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549388#comment-13549388 ] Qiu Zhigang commented on CLOUDSTACK-714: This feature is very useful and impor

RE: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology

I would like to get some of the requirements cleared before working on the FS. There were several assumptions made in the POC and they need to be clarified. 1. CloudStack will have to talk to a attestation server to check if a host is trusted or not. Is it correct to assume the attestation serve

Re: Roadmap of Cloudstack in 2013?

Qui - we have the pieces for a roadmap (potential features) but I don't believe we have a timeline on those, yet. I was eyeing the features list [1] earlier today - got some nice bits in there. I think our next step is to get those into Jira as feature requests and allow people to vote on them

RE: [PROPOSAL] Raise cluster size limit to 16 on VMware

To clarify some more. What I have suggested is to have a max. hosts per cluster limit based on specific HV version. For e.g. for Vmware Version 4.0 will have a max. limit of X (i.e. in any CS Vmware 4.0 cluster, the max. number of hosts that can be added is X) Version 4.1 will have a max. limit

RE: Edit access to Jira

Here are my user details, please add me too Username: talluri Mail id: talluri.w...@gmail.com -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 5:52 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Edit access to Jira I added S

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-721: Bytes sent/received in user statistics is empty (CloudStack 4.0)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8889/#review15228 --- Worked well on regular VR. I'll test the same for VPC VR also before

Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened

On 09/01/13 8:36 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >CLOUDSTACK-777 >This is in the CloudPlatform 3.0.6 release >Docs already submitted, but no FS available. >Unable to find dev list discussion I believe reporter of CLOUDSTACK-777 mistakenly opened duplicate of the bug [1]. FS for bug 312 is at [2] an

Re: ASF master nonoss build failed

+1, Was planning to propose this today in a seperate thread. Our jenkins.a.o might still have relevance for running the non-oss builds and other things we can't stage up to the asf builds.a.o. I'll set those up so we don't end up with broken non-oss. We might just have orphaned away our valuable

Re: [ACS41][QA]QA Scrum MoM - 1/8/2013

Super! Thanks for sending these out. May be I can drag myself out of bed for this at least next time round. Some questions and remarks inline: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:50:02PM -0500, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > QA Scrum MoM 1/8/2013: > > Resources: > ACS 41 QA wiki: > https://cwiki.apache.org/c

RE: ASF master nonoss build failed

I think the build failed as only 'mvn clean install' was tried out before the merge. Should building the nonoss components made mandatory as part of the merge process? -Koushik > -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 12

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix

On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:50:51PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to > accept a donation from Citrix of a set of marvin automated tests > developed by Clogeny, but under contract from Citrix. > > The initial discussion is at [1]. > > Th

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-680) SNMP Alerts support in CloudStack

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549364#comment-13549364 ] Anshul Gangwar commented on CLOUDSTACK-680: --- The FS for this feature is pres

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-841) [QA] Test linked clone option

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] prashant kumar mishra reassigned CLOUDSTACK-841: Assignee: prashant kumar mishra > [QA] Test linked clone op

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-924: source_template_id set to NULL when a template is created from a snapshot

The whole issue was there because if a user wants to track the original template from which the final template was created there was no way, but after the fix whatever NEW templates are used to create a instance volume->snapshot->volume->snapshot->template, the final template will always have

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-297 Reset SSH key to access VM (Similar to reset password)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8905/#review15227 --- Are you the sole author of this work? There are no unit tests, plea

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-297 Reset SSH key to access VM (Similar to reset password)

> On Jan. 10, 2013, 2:39 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Holding on to this review until IP clearance issue is resolved, won't be > > shipped until PPMC gives thumbs up. > > Meanwhile, the patch can be fixed such that it applies cleanly and does not > > break anything on master. Thanks. This is m

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-297 Reset SSH key to access VM (Similar to reset password)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8905/#review15225 --- Holding on to this review until IP clearance issue is resolved, won't

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-297 Reset SSH key to access VM (Similar to reset password)

Hi Chip, Yes we won't, nevertheless hoping that the IP issue will be resolve the contributor can work on their patch so it applied properly on master. Regards. From: Chip Childers [chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 7:36 AM To: ;

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-822 system.vm.password is not encrypted

The only time I log in via VNC is when link local ssh doesn't work. So if we don't know the password then doing ssh to link local isn't an option. On Jan 9, 2013 6:54 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: > > > > On Jan. 10, 2013, 1:04 a.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > > server/src/com/cloud/server/Configurat

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-822 system.vm.password is not encrypted

That will work, but the console access via the console proxy will be rendered useless. On 1/9/13 5:54 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: > > >> On Jan. 10, 2013, 1:04 a.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >> > server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java, line 535 >> > >>

Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened

So I figured I'd add some additional thoughts. There are process problems, and if you want to understand why we consider this so important, take a look at this post[1] by Brett Porter from a few months back. IMO getting the process right is vital to our success as a project, but it isn't the only p

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-297 Reset SSH key to access VM (Similar to reset password)

Please do not commit this until the questions raised about IP clearance have been resolved. Even before the corrections noted by Rohit, I can see that this is a reasonably sized submission that needs agreement before being applied. - chip On Jan 9, 2013, at 8:52 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > -

Roadmap of Cloudstack in 2013?

Hi all, Where could I find the roadmap of cloudstack in 2013? Best Regards, Qiu Zhigang

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix

+1 (binding) We need automated more tests. On 10/01/13 2:20 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to >accept a donation from Citrix of a set of marvin automated tests >developed by Clogeny, but under contract from Citrix. > >The initial discuss

RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target

Hari, Since this feature is dependent on the hypervisor , could you please list the hypervisors we are planning to support this feature ? -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 4:12 PM To: cloudstack-dev@in

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-822 system.vm.password is not encrypted

> On Jan. 10, 2013, 1:04 a.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java, line 535 > > > > > > So how is the admin supposed to be able to login via the console now if > > he c

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-297 Reset SSH key to access VM (Similar to reset password)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8905/#review15223 --- Hi Hari, this patch does not apply on master. You should not use Iden

Re: DevCloud2 secondary storage vm

On 09-Jan-2013, at 5:10 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Oh, I see. No, it's defaulting to host = 10.0.3.10. Yes, if you're running > the management server in the devcloud it probably resolves the devcloud > host to the xenbr1 IP? In which case it doesn't make sense to edit the > devcloud.cfg. Yes,

RE: [ASFCS41] AWS-Style Regions

Kishan, Can you Explain the actual Flow that is involved in the following use case in FS: We have a set up with 1 management server serving 1 region with 1 zone. There are few domains, accounts and projects that have been already been created. Create few resources as these accounts. Now I wan

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix

+1 (binding) On 1/9/13 1:43 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >+1 (binding), more tests FTW! >On 09-Jan-2013, at 12:50 PM, Chip Childers >wrote: > >> I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to >> accept a donation from Citrix of a set of marvin automated tests >> developed by Cloge

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-810: Make DirectAgent thread pool size configurable

Yeah I agree. As Kelven is replacing injection with Spring, we are eased from this pain. Spring supports init function which guarantees be called after all dependencies of this bean being loaded. Then we can inject configDao in AgentManagerImpl and initialize the value in a init(). This avoid cha

RE: new storage framework update

> -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 8:51 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: new storage framework update > > Edison, > > Please see my thoughts in-line below. I apologize for S3-centric nature of

Re: DevCloud2 secondary storage vm

Oh, I see. No, it's defaulting to host = 10.0.3.10. Yes, if you're running the management server in the devcloud it probably resolves the devcloud host to the xenbr1 IP? In which case it doesn't make sense to edit the devcloud.cfg. I like to have everything in the devcloud in order to keep it a ti

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-810: Make DirectAgent thread pool size configurable

You may be right about the specific order of things in this particular case, but we shouldn't assume that the order of initialization is going to be the same forever. On 1/9/13 4:59 PM, "Frank Zhang" wrote: >Though I agree we can put it in initialization code of AgentManagerImpl, >we have to gua

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out interfaces to cloud-utils or create a new artifact cloud-contract

>>The problem is cloud-api has the interfaces and also the cmd, response >>classes. and right now cloud-api depends on cloud-utils, so I cannot write >>re-usable static methods which can make use of interfaces defined in >>cloud-api (cyclic dependency), that's why I'm proposing this I think we

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-822 system.vm.password is not encrypted

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8859/#review15221 --- server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-687) s2s VPN error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jessica Wang resolved CLOUDSTACK-687. - Resolution: Fixed Richard, Your attached screenshots show that the UI code on your m

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-810: Make DirectAgent thread pool size configurable

Though I agree we can put it in initialization code of AgentManagerImpl, we have to guarantee AgentManagerImpl is loaded before ConfigDao. Technically I think it's ok to the Dao is guaranteed before this static block of DirectoAgentAttache. A static block is invoked when a class type initialize

Re: DevCloud2 secondary storage vm

What we should do is have an overrides option in maven itself to override the default cfg file with a developer's own config file. The reason it is set to 192.168.56.1 is that most developers (or users if they are trying to checkout cloudstack) workflow would be to run mgmt server and db server

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-687) s2s VPN error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jessica Wang updated CLOUDSTACK-687: Attachment: jessica3.jpg > s2s VPN error > -- > > Key:

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-687) s2s VPN error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jessica Wang updated CLOUDSTACK-687: Attachment: jessica4.jpg > s2s VPN error > -- > > Key:

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-687) s2s VPN error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jessica Wang updated CLOUDSTACK-687: Attachment: jessica1.jpg > s2s VPN error > -- > > Key:

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-687) s2s VPN error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jessica Wang updated CLOUDSTACK-687: Attachment: jessica2.jpg > s2s VPN error > -- > > Key:

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out interfaces to cloud-utils or create a new artifact cloud-contract

On 09-Jan-2013, at 4:28 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > That's actually what cloud-api is supposed to be. The problem is not there. > The problem is none of the plugin code should have build dependencies on > cloud-core and cloud-server. The Manager interfaces were not intended for > outside consu

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-810: Make DirectAgent thread pool size configurable

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8855/#review15219 --- server/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/DirectAgentAttache.java

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549231#comment-13549231 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: -- If cloud-agent*.rpm is upgraded, then sys

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out interfaces to cloud-utils or create a new artifact cloud-contract

That's actually what cloud-api is supposed to be. The problem is not there. The problem is none of the plugin code should have build dependencies on cloud-core and cloud-server. The Manager interfaces were not intended for outside consumption. That will achieve better separation. We can tal

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-700) Load Balancing using External Provider for Shared Networks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549229#comment-13549229 ] Sudha Ponnaganti commented on CLOUDSTACK-700: - Need details on what this f

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out interfaces to cloud-utils or create a new artifact cloud-contract

I think that the contract is supposed to be in cloud-api, unfortunately a bunch of plugins directly depend on interfaces from cloud-server as well. The network-refactor branch has moved some interfaces out of cloud-server into cloud-api for this purpose. On 1/9/13 3:53 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >

Re: DevCloud2 secondary storage vm

Unless anyone objects, I'm going to change the devcloud.cfg for marvin to add 192.168.56.10 as the 'host' global config. Without this, you don't get the tinylinux template. With it, and a restart after applying the config, you get the template as soon as the secondary storage vm is provisioned. O

RE: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened

> > Hi all, > > In reviewing the feature proposals for 4.1.0, David and I have found many > problems that indicate that development has happened outside of the > community. While I can't be sure that we've found all of the issues, it's > certainly problematic to see this many. > > Please revie

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out interfaces to cloud-utils or create a new artifact cloud-contract

Makes sense to me… On Jan 9, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi all, > > One of the challenges of writing good structural code in CloudStack is that > the artifacts and their classes depend on each other with no code/filesystem > structure. I want to discuss if it's a good idea to spli

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-894) QA GSLB (Global Server Load Balancing) capability for ELB service feature

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti reassigned CLOUDSTACK-894: --- Assignee: Chandan Purushothama > QA GSLB (Global Server Load Balancin

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-891) QA High Availability: EIP enhancements feature

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti reassigned CLOUDSTACK-891: --- Assignee: Sangeetha Hariharan > QA High Availability: EIP enhancement

[DISCUSS] Breaking out interfaces to cloud-utils or create a new artifact cloud-contract

Hi all, One of the challenges of writing good structural code in CloudStack is that the artifacts and their classes depend on each other with no code/filesystem structure. I want to discuss if it's a good idea to split all the interface classes files (from cloud-api, cloud-server, cloud-core) t

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-941) QA - Granular Global Parameters

Sudha Ponnaganti created CLOUDSTACK-941: --- Summary: QA - Granular Global Parameters Key: CLOUDSTACK-941 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-941 Project: CloudStack Issu

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549194#comment-13549194 ] Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: --- The version of scripts in the router is

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-899) QA Scaling up CPU and RAM for running VMs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti reassigned CLOUDSTACK-899: --- Assignee: prashant kumar mishra > QA Scaling up CPU and RAM for runni

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-855) [QA] Test CPU and memory overcommit functionality.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti reassigned CLOUDSTACK-855: --- Assignee: prashant kumar mishra > [QA] Test CPU and memory overcommit

RE: "mvn install" failed on apache 4.0 branch: [ERROR] Could not find the selected project in the reactor: developer -> [Help 1]

4.0 is different, the build document is here: http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/develop/environment.html Try "Ant deploydb" > -Original Message- > From: Jessica Wang > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 2:36 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Edison Su > Cc: Sheng Yang; Al

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-940) QA - Test reset VM on reboot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-940: Summary: QA - Test reset VM on reboot (was: QA - test reset VM ) > QA - T

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-940) QA - test reset VM

Sudha Ponnaganti created CLOUDSTACK-940: --- Summary: QA - test reset VM Key: CLOUDSTACK-940 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-940 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Sub-

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549142#comment-13549142 ] Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: --- I updated MGNT server and KVM a

Re: [MERGE] Merge request: api_refactoring on master

Hi Marcus, To answer your question below: "Does this mean we won't see 10 "SELECT uuid FROM `vm_instance` WHERE id=3079 OR uuid='3079'" type calls for every VM we have when doing listVirtualMachines and such?" Yes, that is exactly one item we have fixed in api_refactoring in removing all Identi

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549134#comment-13549134 ] Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: --- Hi Richard, Have you upgrade the kvm a

Fwd: [MERGE] Merge request: api_refactoring on master

Fwd, +Min, +cs-dev Begin forwarded message: From: Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com>> Subject: RE: [MERGE] Merge request: api_refactoring on master Date: 9 January 2013 11:36:47 AM PST To: Marcus Sorensen mailto:shadow...@gmail.com>> No, so this change will first of all check the kind of

RE: "mvn install" failed on apache 4.0 branch: [ERROR] Could not find the selected project in the reactor: developer -> [Help 1]

Edison, The following code was removed from pom.xml at 2012-09-28 == developer developer tools/apidoc tools/devcloud tools/marvin tools/cli

Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:51 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > So, we have nearly 1500 lines of code changes committed in CLOUDSTACK-306. > > There's 10 people related to the issues listed below, I believe they're > all from the same employer. > > Folks, this is hindering our process to graduate to a to

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549076#comment-13549076 ] Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: --- attached management-server_afte

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Shevel updated CLOUDSTACK-938: -- Attachment: management-server_after_upgrade.zip > s2s VPN trouble > ---

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549070#comment-13549070 ] Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: --- It's obvious something goes wrong when

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549066#comment-13549066 ] Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: --- I updated to the version 4.0.1

RE: "mvn install" failed on apache 4.0 branch: [ERROR] Could not find the selected project in the reactor: developer -> [Help 1]

I removed "~/.m2/repository" many times and still got the same error. Then, I removed "~/.m2/repository/org/apache/xalan/xalan/2.7.1/" only and "mvn install" succeeded (the error was gone). Then, I run "mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb" and got another error:

[ACS41][QA]QA Scrum MoM - 1/8/2013

QA Scrum MoM 1/8/2013: Resources: ACS 41 QA wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+QA+Plan MoM will be posted on wiki : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+QA+Scrum+Meeting+Minutes MoM: 0. This is very first meeting to kic

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-464) Regression in AWSAPI docs, entire sections removed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] sebastien goasguen closed CLOUDSTACK-464. - > Regression in AWSAPI docs, entire sections removed > --

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix

+1 (binding), more tests FTW! On 09-Jan-2013, at 12:50 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to > accept a donation from Citrix of a set of marvin automated tests > developed by Clogeny, but under contract from Citrix. > > The initial discussion

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix

+1 binding Anything for more automated testing. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 12:51 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from C

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-464) Regression in AWSAPI docs, entire sections removed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] sebastien goasguen resolved CLOUDSTACK-464. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.1.0 Assignee: sebastien

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-364) Docs point to download.cloud.com for AWS API script

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] sebastien goasguen closed CLOUDSTACK-364. - Assignee: sebastien goasguen (was: Jessica Tomechak) > Docs point to dow

RE: "mvn install" failed on apache 4.0 branch: "error reading C:\Users\jessica\.m2\repository\org\apache\xalan\xalan\2.7.1\xalan-2.7.1.jar; error in opening zip file"

Remove ~/.m2/repository, then try again. From: Jessica Wang Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:05 AM To: Edison Su; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sheng Yang Subject: RE: "mvn install" failed on apache 4.0 branch: "error reading C:\Users\jessica\.m2\repository\org\apache\xalan\xalan\2.

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-364) Docs point to download.cloud.com for AWS API script

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] sebastien goasguen resolved CLOUDSTACK-364. --- Resolution: Fixed Applied to master. 09b68ce13fa85702417fbce090379e3e94fe

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-364) Docs point to download.cloud.com for AWS API script

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549020#comment-13549020 ] sebastien goasguen commented on CLOUDSTACK-364: --- Closing, fix applied to

RE: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology

Sure Devdeep can provide the details > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 1:00 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:5

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix

+1 Binding -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 12:51 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix I would like to call a vote for the Apache Clou

RE: Ubuntu/Debian packaging progress

FYI, please look into "fpm" - package manager that build packages for deb, rpm - etc... https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 2:08 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: U

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix

On Jan 9, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to > accept a donation from Citrix of a set of marvin automated tests > developed by Clogeny, but under contract from Citrix. +1 (binding)

Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Hari Kannan wrote: > Hi Chip, > > I will let Animesh comment on the IP/repo stuff - regarding the other 2 > topics you raised > > - I wouldn't claim code at a "done" level yet - we did develop code to a > sufficient level to demo, but it would need some more work

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix

+1 (binding) from me as well -kd >-Original Message- >From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] >Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 12:57 PM >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix > >On Wed, Jan 9, 2013, at

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013, at 02:50 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to > accept a donation from Citrix of a set of marvin automated tests > developed by Clogeny, but under contract from Citrix. ... > Please respond with your vote: > +1 - Accept th

RE: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology

Hi Chip, I will let Animesh comment on the IP/repo stuff - regarding the other 2 topics you raised - I wouldn't claim code at a "done" level yet - we did develop code to a sufficient level to demo, but it would need some more work for sure. It hadn't made it as part of any Citrix commercial p

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to > accept a donation from Citrix of a set of marvin automated tests > developed by Clogeny, but under contract from Citrix. +1 (binding) more test are good

Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:44 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: >> This came in as I was following up on action item from IRC today. This >> feature is something that has already been developed before ACS 4.0 and >> processes were formalized an

Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened

So, we have nearly 1500 lines of code changes committed in CLOUDSTACK-306. There's 10 people related to the issues listed below, I believe they're all from the same employer. Folks, this is hindering our process to graduate to a top level Apache project. The first few times it's an honest mista

  1   2   3   >