[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13533711#comment-13533711
]
gavin lee commented on CLOUDSTACK-648:
--
Hi, Isaac
I think the discussion is beyon
Sebastien, how does this proposed patch work? With the query API, there
should not be any need for the registration step since the query API does
not need the certificate. When the admin / user generates the keys these
should be made available to the aws api webapp.
On 12/15/12 8:45 AM, "Sebastie
In basic/shared networks the allocation is bounded by what is already
"used-up". To prevent tenants from hogging all the available ips, there
needs to be limits.
On 12/15/12 8:38 AM, "John Kinsella" wrote:
>I'd remove the limitation of having 30 IPs per interface. Modern OSes can
>support way mo
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:24:26AM -0500, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Lastly, if you look at the code, string builders are used to build
> xml and json responses (primitive c like coding), any suggestions if
> we can use any APL compliant xml and json libraries to build them?
Something from apache common
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13533682#comment-13533682
]
Isaac Chiang commented on CLOUDSTACK-648:
-
Hi Gavin:
Base on the list yo
Hi Gavin:
Base on the list you mentioned, it indeed needs to identify the
relation between the API caller and the update target, then pop-up the
relation to the UI side. I came up with few solutions for solving the
issue, but there are still some side-effects that trouble me:
1. The l
> On Dec. 16, 2012, 4:15 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Looks good. Applied, you can close this out. Thanks!
Marking it as submitted. Thank you Joe
- Radhika
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://revie
Kishan Kavala created CLOUDSTACK-651:
Summary: XenServer : Virtual Router should support more than 7 nics
Key: CLOUDSTACK-651
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-651
Project: Clou
I've modified api layer to return cloudstack-version (prev. cloud-stack-version
in xml) as part of the api cmd response for json type, to be consistent with
xml response which includes version number:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=f8a483fc5a47cb66ac
Kishan Kavala created CLOUDSTACK-650:
Summary: External firewall device usage is broken
Key: CLOUDSTACK-650
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-650
Project: CloudStack
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
terryye updated CLOUDSTACK-593:
---
Description:
我采用的是ubuntu 系统，手工配置了两个网桥，分别为cloudbr0 和cloudbr1。
其中cloudbr0桥接到bond0，部署了一个guest网络，vlan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13533650#comment-13533650
]
gavin lee commented on CLOUDSTACK-648:
--
Hi, Isaac
You remind me. I think it make
I actually just made a few more changes to master. We need more than just
pulling the image, but there's references to EULA and CloudPlatform in docs and
code.
Commit:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=5658fc4249369ce9cefd7f726d7f3af210e30f01
Could s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13533645#comment-13533645
]
John Kinsella commented on CLOUDSTACK-646:
--
updated in master
commit 5658fc4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13533639#comment-13533639
]
Adam Kamali commented on CLOUDSTACK-581:
Thanks for the follow up, in my case
> On Dec. 16, 2012, 1:09 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
> > I guess we need to take care of migration as well. For KVM if its marked
> > removed in DB we need to check if its deleted from secondary storage as
> > well.
Storage gc that runs regularly will identify the outdated snapshots and delete
t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8632/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2012, 4:15 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta, e
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8632/
---
Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Marcus Sorensen.
Description
--
Prasanna Santhanam created CLOUDSTACK-649:
-
Summary: KVM storage gc does not delete the invalid snapshots from
physical storage
Key: CLOUDSTACK-649
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-649
I suggest the UI provides a config options for plugins.
like when the UI loaded a specific plugin, then UI would provide options to
configure the plugin,
something like, enable/disable, or provide IP address if the plugin is
requiring it.
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: "Hugo Trippae
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13533603#comment-13533603
]
Isaac Chiang commented on CLOUDSTACK-648:
-
Hi Gavin:
I have a few quest
Hi Gavin:
I have a few questions for the issue:
1.Is it necessary for a domain admin to update the user's password under
same (sub)domain?
2.Is it necessary for a domain admin to update the sub-domain admin's
password?
Best regards
Isaac
On 12/16/12 11:12 PM, "gavin lee (JIRA)" wrote:
On 16-Dec-2012, at 1:31 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> 2 things:
>
> Yes, I need to update my fork. I'll try to get to that this week.
>
> Second, I have an untested theory that we should be able to figure out
> how to avoid the fork by building vagrant plugins / extensions instead
> of patching t
2 things:
Yes, I need to update my fork. I'll try to get to that this week.
Second, I have an untested theory that we should be able to figure out
how to avoid the fork by building vagrant plugins / extensions instead
of patching the project itself. To me, if possible, this is the ideal
scenario.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8625/#review14565
---
Ship it!
Applied on master:
commit 0661f9b814fe3663f207a5c7960b7465
I'm running OSX 10.8 too, but using either vagrant forks it fails for me but I
think I understand why it fails for me now;
Chip's fork failed with the reason that vbox 4.2 was not supported, and the
upstream fork failed because of the "with_ssh" option.
I think if Chip can help us pull in latest
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8625/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav.
Description
---
This patch f
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> For me xenbox build fails because of virtualbox and some vagrant param error
> which I was not able to figure out why. It's a different problem for me, I
> could n't even see the box being built. I'll try with debian wheezy as well
> (the de
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/#review14558
---
Ship it!
Looks good. Applied, you can close this out. Thanks!
- Joe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
gavin lee updated CLOUDSTACK-648:
-
Summary: The normal users could change their own login password (was: The
normal users could
gavin lee created CLOUDSTACK-648:
Summary: The normal users could be change their own login password
Key: CLOUDSTACK-648
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-648
Project: CloudStack
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8613/#review14554
---
I guess we need to take care of migration as well. For KVM if its mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8623/#review14552
---
Dont you have to take care of migration ? Do you think this upgraded
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8623/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
CS-16544: Create Snapshot (2
Devdeep Singh created CLOUDSTACK-647:
Summary: Sanpshot failing on XenServer 6.1
Key: CLOUDSTACK-647
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-647
Project: CloudStack
Issue Ty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh updated CLOUDSTACK-647:
-
Summary: Snapshot failing on XenServer 6.1 (was: Sanpshot failing on
XenServer 6.1)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh resolved CLOUDSTACK-318.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Adding XenServer Host Fails - 6.0.2 fails with 4.0.0
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
