For XenServer:
- the management server "proxies" commands to the VR by using a host
plugin. The host plugin communicates on a link local port to the VR/other
system vms.
For KVM
- almost similar to XS, but no plugins are used. The java agent resource
runs on the host and communicates on the lin
./build was just sent as a patch.
I'll begin working on ./client.
Eric Pretorious
Truckee, CA
>
> From: Eric
>To: "cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org"
>
>Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 12:46 PM
>Subject: Re: Easy task for folks looking to get involved
>
>Sinc
Lu - With the information provided it seems that the system vm template and
secondary storage have been configured correctly.
Let's circle back to the error in the logs then. Can you try and manually mount
the entire path (1.1.128.2:/data/template/tmpl/1/1) on the xenserver ?
com.cloud.utils.exc
Hi
some more information:
Server IP:1.1.1.1(replaced with example ip, but the path is the same)
path:/data
preparation of the system template:
/usr/lib64/cloud/agent/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt
-m /data -u
http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.v
Hi Nitin:
Thanks for replying.
See my reply.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
>
> Lu,
>
> Can you paste the snippet of logs where you see the error? Can you please
> elaborate on what you mean by secondary storage setup is not working.
> In my knowledge, MS doesn't validate
Lu - Have you seeded your secondary storage with system vm templates ? That
seems to be the issue here.
-Original Message-
From: Lu Heng [mailto:h...@anytimechinese.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 8:43 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Secondary storage is not wor
following data is the error log:(ip has been replaced, rest is same)
2012-06-11 20:00:41,530 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-369:null) Catch Exception
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException on
host:b9f6241d-cbd6-49a8-916e-dff524569dd4 for template: nfs://
1.1.128.2/d
Lu,
Can you paste the snippet of logs where you see the error? Can you please
elaborate on what you mean by secondary storage setup is not working.
In my knowledge, MS doesn't validate the secondary storage path and does very
basic tests while adding it. Typically I have seen the following issue
Hi
Thanks.
The problem was solved. The reason for the error is:
1. The iscsi was added before hand, in which appear it can not be added at
xencenter first, it need to be added from cloudstack ui.
2. the iscsi can not have CHAP enabled.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:26 AM, wrote:
> if you have
if you have assigned a target-iqn to connect ?
At 2012-06-11 21:50:24,"Lu Heng" wrote:
>Hi
>
>I have added successfully added two host, while I trying to add iscsi
>storage, I got following error
>Can not create storage pool through host 5 due to Catch Exception
>com.cloud.utils.exception.Clo
Hi
I have secondary storage setup at management server's /data path, and
while I add it to the zone, it is not working(with information
server: path:/data), however,I can successfully mount
secondary storage in the HV server, any one have idea what is wrong?
--
--
Kind regards.
Lu
This transm
I will take LDAP, Amazon SNS (todo) and XCP.
Also interested in VM state sync and HA part of the middleware if these are
considered 'modules'.
-abhi
>-Original Message-
>From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 7:43 AM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubat
I'll take VMware and console proxy
Kelven
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:21 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Maintainer/committer model for CloudStack
>
> I'll take XenServer and snapshot par
I'll take XenServer and snapshot parts.
Regards,
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 7:57 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Maintainer/committer model for CloudStack
>
> So it seems we have some
I can take up KVM part.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 7:57 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Maintainer/committer model for CloudStack
>
> So it seems we have some consensus around trying this maint
Sorry for late reply.
I'll take OVM/Baremetal and setup now.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 1:33 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Maintainer/committer model for CloudStack
>
> I ca
Yes, Citrix CloudPlatform is based on Apache CloudStack. You can download it
from www.citrix.com.
Suggest we take any further commercial discussion off list…
-kevin
From: d...@soleks.com [mailto:d...@soleks.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 11:24 AM
To: Kevin Kluge
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubato
Since Chip has completed agent, agent-simulator, and python I'll begin on build.
Eric Pretorious
Truckee, CA
>
> From: Chip Childers
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 8:48 AM
>Subject: Re: Easy task for folks looking to get
Anyone who's using CloudStack with MySQL, please see this _extremely_ dangerous
security vulnerability in MySQL, announced on Saturday:
https://community.rapid7.com/community/metasploit/blog/2012/06/11/cve-2012-2122-a-tragically-comedic-security-flaw-in-mysql
Ewan.
Apologies for the late response. None of the virtual routers I have spun up
have ever been on the management network. I haven't dug into it too deeply but
from what I can gather based on the vNICs assigned the management server has
the host backdoor in through the link-local address and issues
Is CloudPlatform available for public download or it's commercial product ?
> Dan, Citrix shipped a “Citrix CloudPlatform 3.0.3”. Based on the
> project now being run as an Apache project and feedback from the
> community we (Citrix hat on) did not ship a CloudStack 3.0.3. The
> community is
>From my understanding it will be product line separation. Is it correct ?
> Dan, Citrix shipped a “Citrix CloudPlatform 3.0.3”. Based on the
> project now being run as an Apache project and feedback from the
> community we (Citrix hat on) did not ship a CloudStack 3.0.3. The
> community is
Dan, Citrix shipped a “Citrix CloudPlatform 3.0.3”. Based on the project now
being run as an Apache project and feedback from the community we (Citrix hat
on) did not ship a CloudStack 3.0.3. The community is working on 4.0.0 with
the needed license changes as discussed in previous threads.
-
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for reply. My CS installation is domain-based, i can't say how many
domains can be supported by TMOS 11.x, but on my side i checked TMOS 10.x
partition concept (access domain) was introduced there (can't say about exact
version), so even TMOS rollback will not help me. I'll be
Dan, when we did the original F5 support in 2010 we decided not to use the
domain concept. It didn't scale very well. IIRC there were at most 256
domains per device (mapping to 256 virtual networks in CloudStack terminology).
This would have underutilized the device. I would suggest investig
We'd need more logs, namely xensource.log and SMlog, from your XenServer.
My assumption is that since it's already attached to the pool in question,
it cant be re-added.
--
æ
On 6/11/12 6:50 AM, "Lu Heng" wrote:
>Hi
>
>I have added successfully added two host, while I trying to add iscsi
>
Agent directory was just sent in as a patch.
I scripted the java file changes, if anyone wants to do other
directories: https://gist.github.com/2910765
-chip
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:57 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at
Hi
I have added successfully added two host, while I trying to add iscsi
storage, I got following error
Can not create storage pool through host 5 due to Catch Exception
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException, create StoragePool failed
due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeExceptio
Summarized requirements as per discussion in the forum at
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/RelOps/Cloudstack+Events
Following are some items for which community opinion will help:
1. What should be used to classify messages (*topic*) - domain or account ?
2. Is there any differentiation be
* Essential since we need firewall rules open before applying network
rules. Without the fix one recieves an UnsupportedCommandAnswer and
fails the application of the network rule
* Also RebootCommand responds with a RebootAnswer - minor fix
Signed-off-by: Prasanna Santhanam
---
.../src/com/cl
Signed-off-by: Deepti Dohare
---
server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java
b/server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java
index b7b7fff..1c24191 100755
--- a/server/src/com/cloud/api
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:34:08PM -0400, kangta123 wrote:
> Hi All:
> I found some of test cases can not run successfully, but in 2.2.y is
> ok that i have been modified some test cases according to my environment.
> So i want know if i can use BVT in 2.2.y to test 3.0 Cloudstack.
>
>
Original Message
Subject: [PATCH] CS-15018: Event USER.LOGIN should contain the client
IP address. Changes made in accordance with the coding convention.
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:23:55 -0400
From: Saksham Srivastava
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
CC: Sa
33 matches
Mail list logo
