Re: Spring and Clojure

ong belief. free of the trappings of OO, types and inheritance------ -Hari Sujathan On Jun 4, 3:34 am, Stuart Halloway wrote: > I think Clojure addresses (at the language level, and better) all the   > issues that Spring addresses. So in the long run Spring is unnecessary   >

will clojure evolve to be able to do systems programming?

thanks & regards, Hari Sujathan --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are mode

No OO restrictions is good. why not still add dependency injection?

ncy inject arbitary code to another arbitary code?? Thanks & Regards, Hari Sujathan --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.

Re: No OO restrictions is good. why not still add dependency injection?

iented software construction" which is simply awesome . -Hari Sujathan On Jun 16, 7:13 am, Stuart Halloway wrote: > Hari, > > I agree--dependency injection is not about OOP. It is about working   > around limitations in certain languages where it is difficult to   > decouple