Hi Gary
I have tried your suggestion but I fear there is a deeper problem.
Thanks
Cliff
On Monday, 8 December 2014 12:03:47 UTC+2, Gary Verhaegen wrote:
>
> I haven't touched test.check yet, si this might be completely off the
> mark, but based on my limited understanding, here&
r points above
and see if I have any more success.
Thanks again for your help Nico.
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 06:07:26 UTC+2, Nicolás Berger wrote:
>
> Hey Cliff,
>
> A couple comments:
>
> * The `size` param in `gen-hierarchy` is being passed as the first param
> to `r
Nico, what is the correct way to turn my function which generates the graph
(using core.logic) into a generator?
On Monday, 8 December 2014 09:04:14 UTC+2, cliff wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I would like to test a function which recursively traverses the nodes in a
> graph and collects th
Hi
I am trying to mimic the following Compojure behaviour, in juxt/bidi
(defroutes routes
> (*resources* "/")
> (GET "/*" req (io/resource "index.html")))
>
> (def http-handler (reload/wrap-reload (api #'routes)))
In Compojure, the 'resources' function seems to load all resources by
de
to '/index.html'
On Monday, 12 January 2015 00:36:59 UTC+2, Dan Kersten wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Take a look at https://github.com/juxt/bidi#resources-and-resourcesmaybe
>
> Regards,
> Dan
>
> On 11 January 2015 at 19:27, cliff >
> wrote:
>
>&
Would something like this be correct?
(def routes
> ["" {
>"/" {["" (br/resources-maybe {:prefix "public"})]
> :home-page-handler}}])
On Monday, 12 January 2015 08:39:19 UTC+2, cliff wrote:
>
> Hi Dan
>
> Thanks fo
to work. It seems
I should be able to somehow build a string such as (str "site.adapters."
*db-adapter*) and use that instead (or something else equally concise).
And of course, this isn't my only problem. But I'll keep it to one
issue at a time.
Regards,
Cliff
--~--~
en something that was originally CPU-bound and made it
I/O-bound.
Regards,
Cliff
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
N
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 22:54 -0700, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sep 30, 12:19 am, Cliff Wells wrote:
>
> > In short, you've taken something that was originally CPU-bound and made it
> > I/O-bound.
>
> I don't think so. The measured times do
it was printed on. Any
contributor in fear of culpability could resort to simple denial. I am
unable to see why someone shouldn't be able to receive a signed PDF via
email and achieve a similar level of confidence that the signor was
legitimate.
Regards,
Cliff
--
You received this message bec
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 13:14 +0100, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> On 4 Dec 2009, at 23:23, Cliff Wells wrote:
>
> > What isn't clear to me is exactly what a piece of paper provides
> > that an
> > electronic form doesn't (aside from inconvenience). I don't see
.
If anyone could give me a nudge in the right direction, I would appreciate
it.
Cliff
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are
12 matches
Mail list logo
