>
> clojars uses
> https://github.com/ato/clojars-web/blob/master/src/clojars/web/safe_hiccup.clj
>
> which automatically escapes.
But that double escapes attribute values if you don't put them in raw-calls.
On Monday, September 2, 2013 6:32:59 AM UTC+2, Ivan Kozik wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 1,
Hi, great work indeed.
One question though: Why do you prefer declaring dependencies between
components of a system explicitly instead of using prismatics Graph?
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 3:01:19 AM UTC+1, Stuart Sierra wrote:
>
> This is a small library/framework I've been working on for a
Is this work related?
http://clojurewest.org/sessions#martin
https://github.com/kanaka/clojurescript
On Monday, March 4, 2013 4:15:07 PM UTC+1, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant wrote:
>
> Any prospective students interested?
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Aaron Cohen
> > wrote:
>
>> I think there
Well, you could also watch Stuart Sierras talks on structuring functional
programs:
Clojure in the Large
http://vimeo.com/46163090
Thinking in Data & Functional Design Patterns
http://www.infoq.com/author/Stuart-Sierra
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 10:48:02 AM UTC+2, Colin Yates wrote:
>
> Yes it d
Why is it necessary to press TAB at all? Couldn't auto-indent be the
default for a line and only manually reindented lines opt-out until
one opts in again using TAB or something?
On 18 Jul., 22:20, Shantanu Kumar wrote:
> > All indentation uses spaces. I guess my fear is that users will find
> >
> * *Meet Clojure*
That's also an upcoming book on Clojure:
http://meetclj.raynes.me/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - plea
Have a look at this:
http://cemerick.com/2011/07/05/flowchart-for-choosing-the-right-clojure-type-definition-form/
Now, as far as i understood, you define a protocol and the extend it
on types defined via defrecord.
That's more like Character is a protocol that defines functions for
movement, at
I wanted to add the map/cycle sample, then thougt of clojuredocs and
here you go:
http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/identity
On 14 Aug., 00:25, Alan Malloy wrote:
> On Aug 13, 12:45 pm, jaime wrote:
>
> > I found an interesting function "identity" which will do nothing but
> > o
I use literals for collection-construction from arbitrary values too. Just
haven't run into that issue.
So, please:
Put hash maps and hash sets back to the way they were -- they worked
>> perfectly fine. Use the duplicate key check in ArrayMap to make ArrayMaps
>> behave like all the other ma
For a decent intro to ring and compojure you probably want to watch
http://skillsmatter.com/podcast/home/functional-web
It's an introduction to the libraries by their author/maintainer, James
Reeves.
On Wednesday, September 5, 2012 9:56:51 AM UTC+2, David Dawson wrote:
>
> Thanks guys!
>
> I'll
I too approve of Mark's reasoning and solution. Probably that should be
moved into
http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Allow+duplicate+map+keys+and+set+elements
On Wednesday, September 5, 2012 6:40:50 AM UTC+2, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
>
> +1 on Mark's most recent reply, that is:
>
> * Revert
>From what I've heard, you are absolutely right on those globals. It isn't
considered idiomatic and should be avoided, like in all other languages.
The singleton analogy fits pretty good.
Some advice on how to encapsulate state in a sane way can be found for
example here: http://vimeo.com/461630
You probably want to watch this:
vimeo.com/46163090
Also, try to think of your programs in terms of pipelines as much as
possible.
You get input, you produce output.
That probably applies to every program ever written, but when you get how
that works in Clojure, it's like an enlightment, at leas
Now I remember the more important video:
www.infoq.com/presentations/Thinking-in-Data
Also (haven't watched):
www.infoq.com/presentations/Programming-with-Values-in-Clojure
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send e
>
> I find this behaviour quite unfortunate because I now have to explicitly
> test
> for nil? and ensure consistent behaviour.
Yes, especially unfortunate considering that Rich said the reducers lib
could be used as a drop in replacement for core to speed up programs, or
something along the
Use abstractions, forget inheritance.
Try modeling what the program does in terms of data conversion.
Then you will only need functions and data.
On Saturday, November 17, 2012 2:40:05 PM UTC+1, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
>
> One project I've considered porting is highly OO, with a large number of
Seems like Knockout [1] could be used [2] also.
I haven't tried that, but it would be great.
Any ideas how the used MVVM-pattern could fit with FP?
[1] http://knockoutjs.com/
[2]
https://github.com/SteveSanderson/knockout/blob/master/build/build-windows.bat#L21
On 31 Aug., 02:39, Mark Rathwell
See https://github.com/nathanmarz/storm
also http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3014039
especially http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3014556
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.c
18 matches
Mail list logo
