rebound (once) that then have dependent values that need to be
recalculated when that rebinding happens?
Thanks,
Yaron
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@goo
ther are known at run time. Does Clojure have a way to express a
'late bound' constant or is the 'right' solution to pass around 19+
arguments to functions or passing around StructMaps or making
everything into thunks?
Thanks!
Yaron
On Feb 15, 1:33 pm, Richard Newm
text. But it doesn't seem like this is the clojure way of handling
the problem. Where as many aspects of functional programming make a
ton of sense to me having to carry a map around everywhere doesn't
seem like an advantage. But I'm probably just missing something.
Yaron
ed
bindings. Which seems like a lot of work.
In other words:
(binding [*A* :A...]
(binding [B (+ *A* 1)...]
(binding [C (+ *B* 1)...]
etc.
And I can't use let (which does allow for internal visibility) because
then other functions I call will bind to the global value not the let
value
bunch of thunks isn't the worst
thing in the world. But it is unfortunate from both a design and
performance perspective.
Yaron
On Feb 16, 11:07 pm, Richard Newman wrote:
> > It seems however that the consensus of the group based on what I've
> > said so far is to pass
bunch of thunks isn't the worst
thing in the world. But it is unfortunate from both a design and
performance perspective.
Yaron
On Feb 16, 11:07 pm, Richard Newman wrote:
> > It seems however that the consensus of the group based on what I've
> > said so far is to pass
I think I see what you're saying. But honestly my goal isn't to
replicate the OO experience. My goal is to replicate how easy OO made
this specific scenario. In other words I want to use Clojure properly
and trying to paste an OO framework on Clojure has got to be a major
anti-pattern. I'm just try
The reason for typing so much is maintainability. I'll have to come
back to this code again and again over a period of years and there's
no chance in heck I'll remember anything I did before. So I've learned
that using clearer variable names, even with a little extra typing, is
a price worth paying
els to two levels. It would be
> pretty easy to build a parallel-binding macro that did this for you.
>
> hth,
>
> Tom
>
> On Feb 17, 10:09 am,Yaron wrote:
>
> > I did but it requires two levels of macro and that made me nervous.
> > The problem is derived
ooking like what I'm used to from my OO days. Put
another way, I speak Clojure with a really thick OO accent and I'd
like to learn better how to speak it like a native. :)
Yaron
On Feb 17, 11:53 am, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2010/2/17Yaron:
>
>
>
> &
Way back when I was a wee lad I had been taught that a thunk is any
function that takes no arguments. My definition for my derived values
never took any arguments because they exclusively relied on global
variables.
For example:
(defn months_actively_renting
"The number of months during t
ading in the 'right' direction? I realize
you can't properly judge it until I'm done but I wanted to find out if
I was roughly heading in the right direction.
Thanks
Yaron
On Feb 17, 10:36 pm, Richard Newman wrote:
> > I don't expect anyone
seudo-constructor {:supplied-1 1
> :supplied-2 2})]
> (println ((:public-method-1 obj) "x" "y" "z"))
> (println ((:public-method-2 obj) "x" "y")))
>
> --jw
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:24 AM
un-calculator
[args]
(let [derived-args (derived-args args)]
(- (rent derived-args) (sell derived-args
I have to think that's preferable to submitting 30+ arguments to rent
and sell.
Or were you suggesting a different approach?
> Looking good!
>
> -R
Mega thank
it's no problem,
everything gets automatically regenerated.
You can see the whole program at
http://www.goland.org/simple-reverse-rent-or-sell.clj
So is this the way you would approach this problem in Clojure?
Thanks,
Yaron
On Feb 19, 10:15 pm, Richard Newman wrote:
> >
I don't think that dataflow works quite right in my case because, if I
understood Mr. Straszheim's posts correctly then dataflows can't have
cycles and I have cycles all over the place. Unfortunately this isn't
visible in the example I gave because I used Sell which doesn't have
cycles. Rent on the
at the REPL in SWANK works in general. I can evaluate my
functions and they work.
So how do I get clojure.repl to load in SWANK?
Thanks,
Yaron
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to cloj
goes.
Thanks!
Yaron
On Nov 15, 5:37 pm, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Sean Corfield
> wrote:
> > Add the following to your ~/.lein/user.clj:
>
> > ;; ~/.lein/user.clj
> > (if (>= (.compareTo (clojure-version) &quo
18 matches
Mail list logo
