Jenkins/leiningen trigger build when a snapshot gets updated

2013-07-06 Thread Trevor Bernard
Hi, Does there exist a Hudson/Jenkins plugin for leiningen to trigger a build when a SNAPSHOT dependency gets updated? Warmest regards, Trevor -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googleg

[ANN] cljzmq-0.1.1 - A Clojure binding for ØMQ

2013-07-29 Thread Trevor Bernard
Hello, I'd like to announce the immediate availability of cljzmq-0.1.1 on maven central. https://github.com/zeromq/cljzmq For sample usage, I've started porting the zguide examples here: https://github.com/trevorbernard/cljzmq-examples Pull requests welcome! Warmest regards, Trev -- -- Y

Re: [ANN] cljzmq-0.1.1 - A Clojure binding for ØMQ

2013-07-30 Thread Trevor Bernard
Here is a simple way to send and receive Clojure data over ØMQ: https://gist.github.com/trevorbernard/6118918 On Monday, July 29, 2013 10:00:13 AM UTC-3, Trevor Bernard wrote: > > Hello, > > I'd like to announce the immediate availability of cljzmq-0.1.1 on maven >

[ANN] phaser-1.1.2 - A Clojure DSL for the LMAX Disruptor 3.0.1

2013-04-16 Thread Trevor Bernard
I'd like to officially announce the immediate availability of Phaser, a Clojure DSL for the LMAX Disruptor 3.0.1. https://github.com/userevents/phaser Pull requests welcome! -Trev -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this

Re: Understanding boxing

2013-05-14 Thread Trevor Bernard
> If you want to be 100% sure, AOT-compile your code and look > at the emitted Java classes with `javap`. > Some observations I found about autoboxing and Clojure. If you typehint a deftype/defrecord with a primitive, the generated class will store it as it's primitive type but this is not the

Re: Clojurescript One and Websockets

2012-08-03 Thread Trevor Bernard
Any updates Kushal Pisavadia on Websockets and Ring jiving? On Monday, March 19, 2012 9:40:20 AM UTC-3, Kushal Pisavadia wrote: > > I am in discussion with James, but it's very high-level at the moment and > no work has been done on integration yet. > > I don't think it'll get into the next tagge