great book
for that, in my opinion), then it is a perfect follow-up if you're
interested in web apps (IMHO).
--
Stefan Kanev ¦ @skanev ¦ http://skanev.com/
You can measure a programmer's perspective by noting his attitude on the
continuing vitality of FORTRAN.
--
You received
I also like "The Joy of Clojure". The first edition covered an oldered
version and I have no idea about the second.
--
Stefan Kanev Ś @skanev Ś http://skanev.com/
Often it is the means that justify the ends: Goals advance technique and
technique survives even when goal structures crumb
(rest remaining)))
result)))
It is a bit Scheme-ish. It builds a map of number of occurences as it
builds a vector, containing the result. It uses the map to figure out
whether to add a suffix or not. It preserves the original order of the
names. The variable names could use s
ered word)
modified (if occurences
(str word "_" occurences)
word)]
(recur (update-in encountered [word] (fnil inc 0))
(conj result modified)
remaining))
result)))
--
Stefa
rable. An adequate format
function can be given by defining a single-parameter version of
`uniquify`.
--
Stefan Kanev ¦ @skanev ¦ http://skanev.com/
Think of all the psychic energy expended in seeking a fundamental distinction
between "algorithm" and "program".
--
--
You
they are
thread-safe, at least to some extend. I assume you mean something
specific?
--
Stefan Kanev ¦ @skanev ¦ http://skanev.com/
If a program manipulates a large amount of data, it does so in a small number
of ways.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
explains in this blog
> post<http://stuartsierra.com/2013/03/29/perils-of-dynamic-scope>
Fair enough. Thanks for the elaboration.
--
Stefan Kanev ¦ @skanev ¦ http://skanev.com/
Bringing computers into the home won't change either one, but may revitalize
the corner saloon.
--
--
You re
is the reason for
the design – :keys seem useful more often than naming individual keys.
Of course, I'm just guessing.
--
Stefan Kanev ¦ @skanev ¦ http://skanev.com/
Beware of the Turing tar-pit in which everything is possible but nothing of
interest is easy.
--
--
You received th
