this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe f
oogle.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more optio
ttle
for the fn body itself as the error message and that could be achieved
without breaking the API.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Herwig Hochleitner wrote:
> 2015-05-28 19:22 GMT+02:00 Mohit Thatte :
>
>> Changing wait-until to a macro seems like the simplest way to tack
I see what you mean, this is nice [?]
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Herwig Hochleitner wrote:
> 2015-05-28 19:42 GMT+02:00 Mohit Thatte :
>>
>> The interesting question here is what constitutes useful information!
>>
>
> (let [pred #(exists? ".foo")]
u received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
lojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
-Mohit Thatte
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
it this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubs
