As a newbie, this is the biggest frustration i have with clojure.
Coming from a scheme background i regularly type
(defn (func a b v) .. )
That produces a completely non-specific and non-locatable error message.
I occasionally resort to cutting my files in halves until i locate the
offending li
I did the upgrade. seemed okay. I a resumed doing the enlive tutorial,
and now when i :
user=> (load "tutorial/scrape1")
nil
nothing comes back.
type returns, nothing.
type (+ 1 1), and i get:
user=> 2
Odd.
From then on works as expected. Even when (load "scrape1")
--
tutorial : http://git
When i code i don't think of them as close. Possibly because Haskell's
functional purity, strong type system, pervasive laziness puts it in
another grade "above" clojure.
Clojure feels closer to Scheme to me, and I don't think it just all the
parenthesis. So the decision for me was between cl
I use confluence elsewhere and it is fine.
On 30/03/11 04:14, Sean Corfield wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
[2] NEW http://dev.clojure.org/display/doc/Getting+Started
Sometimes this wiki seems grindingly slow (for me, at least). Is that
a known issue with Confl
Exercising the code below with (f "ab") produces:
A: a
ANY: a
ANY: b
Which implies (at least to me) that - alt seems to match "a" twice once
against the lit and once against anything. Any suggestions would be
appreciated.
fnparse v: 2.2.7
clojure v: 1.2.0
---
(use 'name.choi.joshua.fnparse)
what matches. Instead the semantics should be more like (fn
[x] (str "ANY: " x)); then you won't see any results unless a complete
parse happens.
On Apr 11, 3:54 am, LordGeoffrey wrote:
Exercising the code below with (f "ab") produces:
A: a
ANY: a
ANY: b
Which implies (a
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_software
tl;dr
model the entire enterprise.
On 10/07/11 09:11, Andreas Kostler wrote:
What is generally considered "enterprise" then?
On 10/07/2011, at 9:07 AM, Sean Corfield wrote:
In which case, apologies to Shree... but those lists don't really
offer
The docs don't say that it is lazy. How (as a newbie) can i tell that it
is lazy?
Docs:
"Creates a new list containing the items prepended to the rest, the
last of which will be treated as a sequence."
On 17/01/11 06:27, Sean Allen wrote:
the documentation on that could be improved. the doc
