nother ("weave").
Depending on the language used to wrap the documentation
and the code.
So given a good programmer, who keeps the documentation up to date,
then extracts and tests the code You have a system that is long lived
and contains the history for those who want it,
the user
c and dynamic contents.
>
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/litprog/
The example language happens not to be clojure.
It could be with no change in syntax.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
using
xslt, just as can the the documentation for that code.
Since it's xml, two characters require escaping. Then only
if you don't want to annotate the code inline.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
You received this message becaus
n?
>
> +1 for modifiers at the end
>
> Let's not forget those of us who search for functions using
> tab-completion in the repl.
And those who search forlornly in http://bit.ly/bPRHP1
trimX makes sense on those grounds, given
the rate of expansion of clojure.
regar
http://richhickey.github.com/clojure/clojure.core-api.html
Doesn't show the (var) function amongst it's 510 options.
Any reason why please?
TIA
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
/special_forms
>
> Sincerely
> Meikel
Thanks. Another list to search.
510+17.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group,
On 27 May 2010 16:43, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:44:46PM +0100, Dave Pawson wrote:
>
>> Thanks. Another list to search.
>> 510+17.
>
> No need to search. From a Repl session:
>
> user=> (doc var)
> --
while investigating. I
>> suspect that it'd be very easy to get sucked into a huge amount of
>> detail which is only tangentially related at best, but I'm sure an
>> overview would help.
>>
>> Thanks for any suggestions,
>> Paul.
>
> --
> You receive
On 28 May 2010 08:30, Alex Ott wrote:
> Re all
>
> Dave Pawson at "Thu, 27 May 2010 20:08:53 +0100" wrote:
> DP> Is there a wiki where all these info sources could be collected please?
> DP> Sounds really quite useful to the newbie.
>
> Just FYI - I hav
is laziness
> in my wrapper. (I say "somewhat" because Saxon stays one result
> element ahead of realization.)
Thanks Perry.
Which Saxon have you wrapped please?
saxon655 or Saxon9he?
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
You received
On 29 May 2010 15:44, Perry Trolard wrote:
>
>
> On May 28, 10:35 pm, Dave Pawson wrote:
>>
>> Which Saxon have you wrapped please?
>> saxon655 or Saxon9he?
>
> Currently I'm wrapping the last Saxon 9B before the switch to the
> three-way split. I plan to
On many interactive shells I use up-arrow to repeat
the last command.
Is that possible with the clojure repl, Linux?
TIA
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" grou
On 5 June 2010 12:23, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Dave Pawson wrote:
>> On many interactive shells I use up-arrow to repeat
>> the last command.
>>
>> Is that possible with the clojure repl, Linux?
>
> You can use rlwrap
l#clojure.core/numerator
TIA
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from n
On 6 June 2010 10:37, Kevin Downey wrote:
> what version of clojure are you using?
---
Clojure 1.1.0
user=>
>
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
>> user=> (def pie 22/7)
>> #&#x
On 6 June 2010 10:48, Kevin Downey wrote:
> http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/commit/5293929c99c7e1b1b3bcdea3d451108c5774b3d1
>
> vs.
>
> http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/commit/5772be9fc5ac9ddf92b727908c20b9aab971224a
Have no meaning to me. sorry.
--
Dave Pawson
On 6 June 2010 11:00, Kevin Downey wrote:
> numerator is added after 1.1.0 was released
Thanks Kevin.
documentation ahead of software! Nice change.. if confusing!
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
You received this message because you
On 6 June 2010 13:35, Moritz Ulrich wrote:
> On Sunday, June 6, 2010, Dave Pawson wrote:
>> On 6 June 2010 11:00, Kevin Downey wrote:
>>> numerator is added after 1.1.0 was released
>>
>> Thanks Kevin.
>> documentation ahead of software! Nice change..
On 7 June 2010 07:58, Steve Purcell wrote:
> On 7 Jun 2010, at 04:28, Dave Pawson wrote:
>
>> On 6 June 2010 13:35, Moritz Ulrich wrote:
>>> Note the "Added in Clojure version 1.2" in the documentation of numerator
>>> ;-)
>>
>>
>> Not u
gt;
> user> (= mailing-list wish-list)
> true
> ;)
Fast becoming my top priority enhancement.
Read the literature on Clojure and I see one line error reports
extracted from the Java stack trace.
Real use shows 101 lines of useless info wrapping one or two lines
of useful information.
http://richhickey.github.com/clojure-contrib/command-line-api.html
Where might I find information on the 'cmdspec' mentioned please?
TIA
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
On 10 June 2010 12:57, Steve Purcell wrote:
> On 10 Jun 2010, at 12:22, Dave Pawson wrote:
>
>> http://richhickey.github.com/clojure-contrib/command-line-api.html
>>
>> Where might I find information on the 'cmdspec' mentioned please?
>
>
> If you
On 10 June 2010 12:57, Steve Purcell wrote:
> On 10 Jun 2010, at 12:22, Dave Pawson wrote:
>
>> http://richhickey.github.com/clojure-contrib/command-line-api.html
>>
>> Where might I find information on the 'cmdspec' mentioned please?
>
>
> If you
23 matches
Mail list logo
