On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
> Can't be done. Once a fn is compiled, it's just Java bytecode.
On the other hand, size of the generated byte code is moderately
interesting (as is runtime performance in time and heap).
I do *love* the fact that the analysis can be done i
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Rayne wrote:
> but I would highly recommend that you just pull it from the github
> repository.
Especially if you're going to use clojure-contrib ...or is there some
"release" of contrib synch'd to clojure releases that I missed
somewhere?
--~--~-~--~---
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Alex Osborne wrote:
> There's a 1.0 compatible branch on github. [...]
Thanks, I missed that branch.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this
--
Daniel Simms
On Nov 24, 2009, at 22:23, Adrian Cuthbertson wrote:
> The other spin-off of this is that using the repl, one is able to
> really explore the api's of these big libraries dynamically and get to
> know them much more intimately than when doing static compilation/r
No comments on this:
http://blogs.sun.com/mr/entry/closures
yet? It's no help to Clojure, but it's nice to see similar
motivations.
Also, I wanted to chime in with something like "we already have
closures: use Clojure! or Jython, or... So how about TCO?"
--
You received this message beca
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Williams
wrote:
> The project is up on Github: http://github.com/edgecase/ruby_koans
Another get-to-know-your-language project that I like is:
http://pythonchallenge.com
... and can be fun for wizards as well (since part of it is puzzle
solving, not j
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:
> [...] Individual users
>
> If you are an individual user of Clojure, I encourage you to
> contribute $100/year to Clojure development, via the donation system. [...]
That's less than 0.3 starbucks-coffees per day! (Even less per day
if you
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Vagif Verdi wrote:
> There a binary protocol library http://hessian.caucho.com/
+1
(also, there's a functionally equivalent text protocol, burlap, if you
need human readability in some situations, say development or
debugging. A common idiom is to use Burlap in
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:46 AM, HB wrote:
> Since Clojure is a LISP dialect, does this mean that it doesn't
> support OOP?
Another answer is that ``it could be if you wanted it to be'', for example:
http://s-expressions.com/2009/12/10/frumios-a-silly-object-system-for-clojure/
.
--
You
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:23 PM, ataggart wrote:
> If you really need logging, then log4j is probably your best bet
> anyway.
Or SLF4J, which seems to be the way many (most?) java libraries depend
on a some logging library.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
10 matches
Mail list logo
