I have a newbie question about anonymous functions. Why does the first form
below work and the second form does not?
user> ((fn [] "foo"))
"foo"
user> (#("foo"))
; Evaluation aborted.
Thanks,
Chad
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
oes anyone know what is going on here?
Thanks for your help,
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmail.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to cloj
Yes. The recent commit fixed the problem and I am back up and running. I
guess that's the problem with living on the bleeding edge...
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmail.com
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Rob Wolfe wrote:
>
>
>
> Chad Harrington napisał(a):
> >
Andy,
I just thought I'd mention that for 80 cents you can rent an hour on an
8-core EC2 machine with 7GB of RAM. We use EC2 a lot for such things at
work. It may be an easy way for you to accomplish your goals.
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmai
(nth (val %) 1)
(key %))
data
(defn name-by-age [age]
(first (data (age-index age
(println (name-by-age 26))
------ code end ---
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmail.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~
] [age k]) data)))
>
Jarkko,
Thank you for your clear, clean code. It's nice to have such a helpful
Clojure community!
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmail.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups &q
vely and informative
> but I hope it's run its course.
>
> --Chouser
>
+1
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmail.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" grou
share with the community?
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmail.com
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:10 PM, bradford cross wrote:
> We have just released flightcaster.com which uses statistical inference
> and machine learning to predict flight delays in advance of airlines
> (initial results
- Friday / Saturday
- SF Bay Area
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:36 AM, dysinger wrote:
> We will be organizing a conference in the next month for 2010
> (probably in the fall). One question I would like to ask is, given
> the conference is proba
.js line 1426 : 32
Can others reproduce this? This issue is blocking us from using the latest
cljs, as we rely on core.async and :advanced optimizations.
Thank you for your efforts,
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmail.com
c...@farbetter.com
--
You received this message because you are subscr
SON encoding / decoding and produces much smaller output. It
also supports Avro schema evolution
<http://avro.apache.org/docs/current/spec.html#Schema+Resolution>, allowing
your data formats to change over time without breaking things.
Issues and PRs are welcomed.
Chad Harrington
chad.ha
Hi Łukasz,
Logical types could certainly be added. Are you more interested in
arbitrary logical type support or the specific logical types defined in the
spec (Decimal, Date, Time, Timestamp, Duration)? Understanding your use
case will help with the design.
Thanks,
Chad Harrington
chad.harring
Good idea. I will try to add that to the perf results sometime this week.
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmail.com
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 10:37 PM Tommi Reiman
wrote:
> Looks good. Would be interesting to see the JVM Json perf tested also with
> https://github.com/metosin/js
s it easy
to do that.
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmail.com
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 9:59 PM Gerard Klijs wrote:
> The big penalty for the smaller size is that you need the scheme in order
> to deserialize the message. This can make some uses much more complex. For
> example when sendi
The JavaScript perf seems okay to me:
https://github.com/deercreeklabs/lancaster/blob/master/README.md#performance
I probably need to test Transit alongside the other cljs performance tests.
I will try to do more / better perf testing this week.
Thanks for your interest,
Chad Harrington
orking out the details of the feature.
Thanks for your interest,
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:38 AM Łukasz Korecki
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We're interested in the Date/Time/Timestamp part of the spec. A bit of
> background: our RabbitMQ framewor
e Google's ability to load content. Interestingly,
most other sites worked fine. Turning off my personal hotspot cleared
things up immediately.
No idea if that is a problem you have, but I thought I'd mention it just in
case.
Best regards,
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmail.com
On Mon, A
17 matches
Mail list logo