FWIW, this series of blog posts from 2012 about making a roguelike in
Clojure is what convinced me to start learning the language:
http://stevelosh.com/blog/2012/07/caves-of-clojure-01/
On Thursday, 26 April 2018 03:14:23 UTC+8, puzzler wrote:
>
> I created this game for last year's Hour of Code
Awesome, thanks! Writing something like this has been on my to-do list for
ages, I'm glad I don't have to now :)
On Wednesday, 18 April 2018 04:19:38 UTC+8, Immo Heikkinen wrote:
>
> I have written a small Leiningen plugin to help keeping Clojure(Script) ns
> declarations lexicographically sorte
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Robert Levy wrote:
> What would you say is the advantage of using Flutter instead of React
> Native? Assuming you're not interested in Dart, what is the selling point?
>
I haven't used it yet but the interesting bits to me are efficiency (no
Javascript bridge) a
Great to read the snake code for inspiration. I see you use cond with contains?
to branch on a map key.
I was thinking about how to manage game state which has physics, one thing
which occurred to me would be have a headless browser running phaser.js, the
clients do the same and are periodicall
Flutter definitely looks interesting, but I guess to make it work with
Clojure would require writing a 'ClojureDart', i.e. a Clojure that compiles
to Dart code. Given Dart sits somewhere between Java and Javascript, this
is maybe not undoable, but would certainly be a lot of work.
On Thursday,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 1:06 PM Kees-Jochem Wehrmeijer
wrote:
> Flutter definitely looks interesting, but I guess to make it work with
> Clojure would require writing a 'ClojureDart', i.e. a Clojure that compiles
> to Dart code. Given Dart sits somewhere between Java and Javascript, this
> is maybe
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 10:08 AM Gregg Reynolds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Robert Levy wrote:
>
>> What would you say is the advantage of using Flutter instead of React
>> Native? Assuming you're not interested in Dart, what is the selling point?
>>
>
> I haven't used it yet bu
Jonas Enlund started the Eastwood project [1], and beginning around 2014 I
hacked on it fairly feverishly for a while, along with Nicola Mometto who
developed the tools.reader, tools.analyzer, and tools.analyzer.jvm
libraries upon which Eastwood is based.
I have not spent time to do much with East
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Kris Leech wrote:
> Puzzler, do you have source online?
>
Sorry, no. That project is closed source.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note
Hi Andy,
At ardoq, where I now work, and at Telenor Digital, where I previously worked,
we had Eastwood running on all our Clojure projects,
and it’s definitively one of the more under-appreciated tools in my tool box.
It doesn’t make much of itself, but when it speaks, I listen.
I'd be more
10 matches
Mail list logo
