While I'm not as familiar with the CLR and its bytecode syntax, from what I
can tell from the README, mage and insn seem to have similar goals and
ideas.
I'll attempt to summarize the differences that I could find, if the mage
author *nasser* is available I would appreciate his or her input.
M
This looks cool, would it be possible to use this to have a deep nested clojure
map automatically create a Java nesting of pojos? Like each key becomes a field
of an actual class?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group
That would be possible. If I understand your meaning, something like:
(require '[insn.core :as insn])
(defn make-pojos [cname m]
(let [[fields subs] (partition-by (comp map? second) m)
const-type #(if (string? %) String :int)]
(doseq [[sname sm] subs]
(make-pojos (str cname \$
Quit some time ago I wrote a Clojure program. In it I used future to
display a swing window like:
(defn show-search-quotes
[search-str]
(debug-info "show-search-quotes enter")
(future
(info-table (format "Search Quotes (Case Independent): %s"
search-str)
I’d hazard a guess that something inside the future --- perhaps the
search-quotes function call? – is throwing an exception and that’s just being
“swallowed” because it’s in another thread.
As a general rule of thumb to debug any issues with futures, replace future
with identity and see what th
And, yes, definitely, you should pick up Clojure again!!
Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood
From: Cecil Westerhof
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 2:38 PM
To:
2017-08-20 1:54 GMT+02:00 Sean Corfield :
> I’d hazard a guess that something inside the future --- perhaps the
> search-quotes function call? – is throwing an exception and that’s just
> being “swallowed” because it’s in another thread.
>
>
>
> As a general rule of thumb to debug any issues with
2017-08-20 1:57 GMT+02:00 Sean Corfield :
> And, yes, definitely, you should pick up Clojure again!!
>
:-D
--
Cecil Westerhof
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that
