On 20 Jul 2017, at 17:14, Sean Corfield wrote:
> A lot of big, well-known FOSS projects require a signed CA and have very
> specific contributing processes. Either folks will contribute or they won’t.
> I find it hard to believe that nREPL will suddenly get a stream of
> contributions that it w
Jose,
Leaving aside shrinking the jar, you could try:
- Structuring your application so it's easier to construct plausible
inputs in the tests / REPL
- Using https://github.com/lambci/docker-lambda locally, to get an
environment closer to the deployment target
- Deploying to a geographically cl
Hey everyone,
Just in the time for EuroClojure 2017, we've released a major update to
CIDER - the popular Clojure interactive development environment, built on
top of Emacs and nREPL.
The big news is that CIDER 0.15 ships with a lot of features related to
clojure.spec and that the debugger is now
On 20 July 2017 at 08:14, Sean Corfield wrote:
> At the risk of being unpopular… 😊
>
>
>
> I think there are quite a few people who _*say*_ that it’s an obstacle to
> their contributing to Clojure or to a Contrib library but in reality they
> wouldn’t actually contribute anyway, so it becomes an
On 18 July 2017 at 15:48, Chas Emerick wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been approached many, many times over the years (and more frequently
> since the development and inclusion of socket-repl) about the potential of
> moving nREPL[1] out of clojure contrib…either back to its original
> location[2], or
Congratulations and thanks Bozhidar and all involved!
Bozhidar Batsov writes:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Just in the time for EuroClojure 2017, we've released a major update to
> CIDER - the popular Clojure interactive development environment, built on
> top of Emacs and nREPL.
>
> The big news is that C
Hey Clojurians,
I'm experiencing some odd behavior with cond-> and was wondering if anyone
had any ideas. I was troubleshooting a very slow load time in one of our
projects, and traced it to a web templating library we maintain. One of the
functions in this lib, `cell` takes a *very* long time (
Here's my how-to question for someone with in-depth knowledge of the
clojure/clojurescript compiler:
If I have a string representing a valid Clojure form, say for example, "(+
1 (* 2 (/ 6 3)))", how would I "reduce" this form to the form with one
s-expr evaluated? That is, how would I obtain "(
Here's a simplified example:
(defn wat [& {:keys [a b c d e f
map-0 map-1 map-2]}]
(cond-> "foo"
a (str a)
b (str b)
c (str c)
d (str d)
e (str e)
f (str f)
map-0 (cond->
(:a map-0) (str (:a map-0))
(:b map-0) (str (:b
The answer lies in the term "REPL". You start by reading the string, you
can use `clojure.core/read-string` for this case. This will convert your
string into Clojure data:
"(+ 1 (* 2 2))" => (+ 1 (* 2 2))
That's the "R" part of "REPL", read.
Next step is "E" for "eval". We need to evaluate the s
Hi Chas,
I have no hard feelings about the hosting or organisation of the nrepl
project. If you feel that a different organisation would improve things,
then go for it.
In contrast to your invest, I haven't much contributed besides problems and
complexity. ;-P If you need anything regarding my
11 matches
Mail list logo