Here's a demo of generating clojure.spec specs + Typed Clojure types
for functions and macros.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRJeHthzOjk
Thanks for your support!
Ambrose
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant <
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Happy to announ
When I see mailing list posts like this I like to play the devil's advocate
a bit (at least in my own mind) and try to find problems with including a
given patch in Clojure.
A few things to consider:
1) There are really three answers to patches: "yes", "no" and "not now".
That is to say, because a
Wow. I can imagine this saving a day or two when trying to type or spec a
legacy codebase.
Wouldn't it also be / Is it possible to infer deeper calling levels?
I. e. if (defn f [x] (g x)) generate types/specs for g and f from (f 42)?
Because when one doesn't have unit tests, she could gain expo
This is really cool. So I'll try to "sell it" to people that don't know
whether this will be useful to them:
1. If you don't write types / specs because the gain isn't worth the
effort to you--this would reduce the effort considerably.
2. This could be easily re-purposed to spec / docu
