Hi guys,
Seems there has been no activity on core.logic since November 2015,
Is core.logic still maintained ?
Cheers
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from
I'm sure David would be happy to look at issues but it's pretty far down his
priority list these days.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are
Hi Mike!
Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2016 19:00:11 UTC+2 schrieb Mike Rodriguez:
>
> ...
> I can see how the docs @ http://clojure.org/reference/evaluation could
> mislead someone to thinking that it is perfectly fine and acceptable to
> embed any objects into a call to `eval`, but I really don't think t
Hi Jason,
thank for your hints, perhaps I can use your workaround.
Johannes
Am Sonntag, 8. Mai 2016 03:43:22 UTC+2 schrieb Jason Wolfe:
>
> Hi Johannes,
>
> I've run into this before. Here is a ticket [1] and some context and a
> potential workaround [2]:
>
> [1] http://dev.clojure.org/jira/b
I've been doing some code profiling lately, and I made one small change
that drastically improved performance.
I had this function:
(defn run-systems
"Run the systems in the order specified over
the cross-map specified."
([cm] (run-systems system-order cm))
([order cm]
(reduce (fn [a
In my experience, the more intermediate collections you eliminate, the more
you gain:
*Transducers:*
(criterium.core/with-progress-reporting
(criterium.core/quick-bench
(into []
(comp
(map inc))
(range 10
Execution time mean : 3.803073
What?
Clojure Contrib wrapper for JDBC
https://github.com/clojure/java.jdbc#change-log
[org.clojure/java.jdbc “0.6.0-rc2”]
I had expected to go from RC 1 to Gold but the new, more consistent API offered
some opportunities for more improvements and cleaning up before we ge
I'm implementing a data structure with persistent and transient
implementations. (Code is here:
https://github.com/JvJ/cross-map/blob/master/src/cross_map/core.cljc#L446).
When I try to convert a persistent cross-map to a transient cross-map, I
get the following exception:
ClassCastException
Update to this topic: I can create a transient cross-map, but the failure
occurs when I call "into" on a persistent cross-map. I knew that into used
transients internally in certain cases, but is there something that I'm
missing?
On Sunday, 8 May 2016 19:21:35 UTC-7, JvJ wrote:
>
> I'm implem
Second update: It's the conversion from transient back to persistent that
causes the problem.
On Sunday, 8 May 2016 19:24:18 UTC-7, JvJ wrote:
>
> Update to this topic: I can create a transient cross-map, but the failure
> occurs when I call "into" on a persistent cross-map. I knew that into u
Any chance you're using an older version of potemkin? There was a bug like this
exposed by Clojure 1.8. https://github.com/ztellman/vertigo/issues/7
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googleg
I'm not using potemkin.
On Sunday, 8 May 2016 20:12:49 UTC-7, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> Any chance you're using an older version of potemkin? There was a bug like
> this exposed by Clojure 1.8. https://github.com/ztellman/vertigo/issues/7
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
My theory has been, that transducer stacks inline much better, hence allow
for more optimizations by the jit.
In particular I suspect that escape analysis works better on them, so the
compiler can even move some of the remaining allocations to the stack.
To verify this, try running with -verbose:g
13 matches
Mail list logo
