(Or is it Clojurists? I've seen both.)
I've just moved to Berwick-upon-Tweed and have a couple months of leisure
time. I'm planning to have a decent stab at learning Clojure, but it would
be great to meet up with someone with similar interests occasionally. I've
read a few books (Joy of Clojure
In your examples, you put a let around the reads from timeouts.
(let [_ (a/deferred
(a/go
(a/http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving ema
On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 4:40:07 PM UTC-5, Michael Blume wrote:
>
>
> In other people's Clojure code I sometimes see things like
>
> (zipmap
> (map some-fn (keys m))
> (map other-fn (vals m)))
>
> If it were my code I'd be much more inclined to write
>
> (into {}
> (for [[k v] m]
> [
Hi,
this looks like quite a serious bug to me (at least it messed up my
project):
First taking the code taken from grimoire:
clojurechess.position> (defn range
"Returns a lazy seq of nums from start (inclusive) to end
(exclusive), by step, where start defaults to 0, step to 1, and end to
I was trying to write a test.check property for this, and it seems to have
a found a different bug around `count` and `range`.
```
*clojure-version*
;;=> {:major 1, :minor 7, :incremental 0, :qualifier "beta1"}
(require '[clojure.test.check :as tc])
(require '[clojure.test.check.generators :as ge
Ouch. Suspect this is the
problem
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/LongRange.java#L161
Pretty sure that boolean should be round the other way.
On Saturday, April 18, 2015 at 12:32:40 PM UTC-7, Mathias De Wachter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this looks like quite a serio
I suspect it would, I think I was just letting the mechanics of Manifold's
let-flow macro color my judgment. Happy to accept any pull requests which
make my core.async examples more idiomatic.
On Apr 18, 2015 8:33 AM, "Matthias Lange" wrote:
> In your examples, you put a let around the reads from
Created http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1709 and
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1710 around the two issues.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Beau Fabry wrote:
> Ouch. Suspect this is the problem
> https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/LongRange.java#L
Thanks all! Will definitely fix before release.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To
Langohr [1] is a small Clojure client for RabbitMQ.
Release notes:
http://blog.clojurewerkz.org/blog/2015/04/19/langohr-3-dot-2-0-is-released/
1. http://clojurerabbitmq.info
--
@michaelklishin, github.com/michaelklishin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Gr
Here's my workflow:
(defn workflow-jwt-signed
[& {:keys [credential-fn] :as jwt-config}]
(fn [{{:strs [authorization]} :headers :as request}]
(when (and authorization (re-matches #"\s*Bearer\s+(.+)" authorization))
(println "Found auth" authorization)
(if-let [claims (try (-> (
11 matches
Mail list logo
