Rich Morin writes:
> This makes me wonder about the number of Clojure-driven projects that
> meet Tim O'Reilly's notions of "doing something worthwhile":
>
> “Pursue something so important that even if you fail,
>the world is better off with you having tried.”
I never understood how "flog
>
> I have done several things in my life where, at least, I am sure that
> the world would not have been better off if I hadn't tried. I think this
> is enough to hope for.
>
I'm fooling around with Weather Jerk (http://www.weatherjerk.com/) in my
spare time. It uh... solves the problem of h
Component: object lifecycle management & dependency injection
https://github.com/stuartsierra/component
Version 0.2.1.
in Leiningen: [com.stuartsierra/component "0.2.1"]
Changes in this release:
* Conveniences
* Added arities to `start-system` and `stop-system`
* Generic `system-map` f
On Dec 19, 2013, at 02:36, Phillip Lord wrote:
> I never understood how "flog books about technology" came into that
> category.
The books are simply an artifact and technology is only one domain.
Tim has spent decades promoting the interchange of well-chosen ideas.
For example, although Christ
You learn something new every day. As this always been the way that Rx
worked (the locking part)? I haven't used Rx for several years, so I may be
off in my assumptions.
Timothy
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Matthew Podwysocki <
matthew.podwyso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can easily do bi-dir
You can easily do bi-directional communication using Rx, but it's involving
two Subjects, which are both Observables and Observers, or any flavor
thereof Subjects whether Replay, Async, Behavior, or Buffered or Controlled
(for backpressure coming soon).
var subject1 = new Rx.Subject();
var subj
Timothy,
Yes, it has always been this way enforced with a strict grammar with
locking. The only place we don't care is in JavaScript, because we're
single threaded.
Matt
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 11:51:46 AM UTC-5, tbc++ wrote:
>
> You learn something new every day. As this always been t
Thank you everyone for your advice, I found it useful and think that I am
part-way to a solution using clojure.data.xml/source-seq as suggested by
dannue.
I'll post what I have done so far in the hope it might help someone else...
comments on style welcome.
*Solution*:
Given the following XML
Enjoy,
http://swannodette.github.io/2013/12/17/the-future-of-javascript-mvcs/
David
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - ple
Hey David,
looks really interesting although I have to be a little critical of your
benchmarks. Add a download of 200 todos via xhr and then do the render, you
will most certainly lose to other JS Framework out there (especially if you
choose EDN over JSON) cause of the extra overhead associate
Thank you for taking the time to write such a detailed explanation. That
clears up my understanding of the library considerably.
- James
On 19 December 2013 03:45, Micha Niskin wrote:
> Ah, yes. There are some gaps in the docs that need to be fixed. To answer
> your questions:
>
>
>1. The
Being acquired by Monsanto does not invalidate "The Climate Corporation"'s
work, which I find extremely exciting and valuable. In fact, why would
their work be "worthwhile" by your worthiness definition? They are just
insurance sellers, after all.
Clojure itself is the ultimate worthwhile proje
Why is a programming language---which one would think is in itself neutral,
being a tool that can be put to a variety of uses---more obviously
worthwhile (let alone the ultimate worthwhile thing!) than sellers of
insurance, who, after all, do, if they're honest, insulate people from what
would othe
On Dec 19, 2013, at 16:02, Bruno Kim Medeiros Cesar wrote:
> Being acquired by Monsanto does not invalidate "The Climate
> Corporation"'s work, which I find extremely exciting and
> valuable. In fact, why would their work be "worthwhile" by
> your worthiness definition? They are just insurance se
An asynchrononous TCP echo client/server in Clojure using Java 7 NIO.2.
https://github.com/bluemont/clj-async-tcp-echo-nio.2
As I've been diving into async libraries in Java and Clojure, I thought it
would be nice to make a simple example with the Java 7 NIO.2 async classes.
I'm sure there is room
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Rich Morin wrote:
> I have no argument with The Climate Corporation's business model;
> my problems are with Monsanto. That said, I don't want to dive
> off into that discussion. In fact, my comment about them should
> probably have been left out of my initial po
Hi,
Thanks for the great framework. I am loving it and will give it a try in a
pet project. A few nitpicks -
1. Why not use hiccup data structure for representing DOM, instead of the
custom fns and macros. This provides several advantages where your DOM is
just data and you can manipulate it
Yep, "positive impact" is pretty much entirely opinion-based.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Rich Morin wrote:
> > I have no argument with The Climate Corporation's business model;
> > my problems are with Monsanto. That said, I don't w
Suggestions of endeavors using clojure for something worthwhile itself
seems like an entirely worthwhile discussion if people can resist the
temptation to debate what worthwhile means and to disagree with other
people's concept of worthwhile. For example, here's a recipe for a useful
discussion: I
Fair enough :)
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:09 PM, John Wiseman wrote:
> Suggestions of endeavors using clojure for something worthwhile itself
> seems like an entirely worthwhile discussion if people can resist the
> temptation to debate what worthwhile means and to disagree with other
> people'
20 matches
Mail list logo
