Re: Partitioning a list when the result of a predicate becomes a certain value.

Thanks for the replies guys - has given me things to mull over. On Thursday, 10 May 2012 22:11:18 UTC+1, Ant wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am battering my head against the following problem which I'm sure is > straightforward if only I knew how. I want to partition the following > list: > > '("aa12

Re: How to configure a Clojure library at runtime?

On Saturday, May 12, 2012 12:44:45 AM UTC-5, Baishampayan Ghose wrote: > > > There are many ways of doing this. One approach that I have seen a lot > is something like this - > > ;; core.clj > > (def ^:dynamic *settings* {:default :stuff}) ;; the default settings can > be nil > I was experim

Re: How to configure a Clojure library at runtime?

> ...but Andrew Cooke pointed out that using a global var would preclude you > from being able to use multiple, independent graph "instances" in your > program, whereas you can in the Python version > (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10540999/how-to-configure-a-clojure-library-at-runtime). > > A

{ANN} clj.monitor: monitoring applications in clojure

Hi,all I've implemented a simple DSL for monitoring apps in clojure based on SSH. Usage: https://github.com/killme2008/clj.monitor An example: (defcluster mysql :clients [{:user "deploy" :host "mysql.app.com"}]) (defmonitor mysql-monitor ;;Tasks to monitor mysql,we just

Re: How to configure a Clojure library at runtime?

On Saturday, May 12, 2012 8:12:53 AM UTC-5, Baishampayan Ghose wrote: > > > You got the basic idea right, that of creating a lexical closure over > the config map. But I personally don't like the approach of returning > a function that takes a function and applies it over the other args. > > I

Defining custom tags using hiccup ?

Hi, I like the way hiccup allows you to represent html elements as datastructure. However this is limited to native elements. If you want to represent custom elements, the solution is to crate a function which will then spit out the basic html tags that hiccup compiler understands. It would be

closure example doesn't need let?

I saw this example of a simple closure in Joy of Clojure and on some Clojure tutorial page. (defn adder[n] (let [x n] (fn[y] (+ y x Is the let necessary? It seems redundant. I tried it like this and it seems to work fine. (defn adder[n] (fn[y] (+ y n)) -- You received this me

Re: closure example doesn't need let?

It's the same program. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this gro

Re: closure example doesn't need let?

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:20 AM, larry wrote: > (defn adder[n] >   (let [x n] > (fn[y] (+ y x > > Is the let necessary?  It seems redundant. Can you provide a specific reference to where the example appears in Joy of Clojure (page number)? I assume the actual example in context is trying

Re: Leiningen 2.0.0-preview4

On May 11, 10:02 pm, Phil Hagelberg wrote: > > ## 2.0.0-preview4 / 2012-05-11 > > {snip} > * Use Clojure 1.4.0 internally; plugins have access to new Clojure features. > Hi Phil, After `lein self-install`, when I first ran `lein help` I get this output: . Jus

Re: [ANN] Exploding Fish: A URI Library for Clojure

Aha! Thanks for explaining this here as well as in detail on IRC and working through it with me. It does indeed make sense. Furthermore, we've already had this discussion on IRC, but at least one person thought that my suggestions above were me being a jerk. Just wanted to publicly state here t

Re: Leiningen 2.0.0-preview4

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 11:06 AM, John Gabriele wrote: > After `lein self-install`, when I first ran `lein help` I get this > output: . Just a few questions: > > * What's the Clojure 1.3.0 jar required for if lein is using 1.4.0 internally? Some of the dependen

Re: [ANN] Exploding Fish: A URI Library for Clojure

Have you seen the recent buzz about java.net.URL's hashCode depending on the state of the internet[1]? Can Exploding Fish do something about this annoyance? [1]: http://michaelscharf.blogspot.de/2006/11/javaneturlequals-and-hashcode-make.html On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Anthony Grimes wro

Re: [ANN] Exploding Fish: A URI Library for Clojure

On Saturday, May 12, 2012 6:28:14 PM UTC-4, Moritz Ulrich wrote: > > Have you seen the recent buzz about java.net.URL's hashCode depending > on the state of the internet[1]? > Can Exploding Fish do something about this annoyance? > > [1]: > http://michaelscharf.blogspot.de/2006/11/javaneturlo

Re: Leiningen 2.0.0-preview4

On May 12, 4:41 pm, Phil Hagelberg wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 11:06 AM, John Gabriele wrote: > > > By the way, I like that you can now pass extra args to `lein new` to > > create a project of a specific type (such as plugin). What do you > > think of adding 2 more stock options: application

Re: Leiningen 2.0.0-preview4

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 4:07 PM, John Gabriele wrote: >  * an app would have `:main foo.core` in the project.clj >  * an app would have the `-main` function in core.clj >  * an app would have a :gen-class in its ns declaration in core.clj Sure, that makes sense. Feel free to open an issue and/or

Re: Leiningen 2.0.0-preview4

On May 12, 7:07 pm, John Gabriele wrote: Whoops. Typo: > > Another important reason for having a good default README.md template > specifically for libs is that, at some point, I'm guessing that > clojars.org will extract and render them as html, and it will be nice > if there's some conventions

Re: [ANN] Exploding Fish: A URI Library for Clojure

> Second thing is your (ns ..) declarations. > I've updated it to use :require instead of :use. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moder

Re: Defining custom tags using hiccup ?

On 12 May 2012 17:12, Murtaza Husain wrote: > Instead of that if it allowed an extensible compiler with the same macro > defelem, I could call - > > [:link-to {:url "http://google.com"} "Hi this is google"] > > Will that not be more clojurey :) That seems more complicated, IMO. Why require an cus

Re: Defining custom tags using hiccup ?

On Saturday, May 12, 2012 10:36:35 PM UTC-4, James Reeves wrote: > That seems more complicated, IMO. Why require an custom macro system > when normal functions do the same job? What's the advantage? > The same reason hiccup uses data structures to represent HTML instead of using nested function

Re: Defining custom tags using hiccup ?

As I see it, link-to is a function that saves you a little bit of typing if you choose to use it. But if you don't, you could just write [:a {:href "blah"} "Blah"] where :a is exactly :link-to, just spelt differently. what is proposed above seems to be renaming of elements and attributes - but

Re: Defining custom tags using hiccup ?

Thats the whole idea. The ability to build abstractions. Currently I have a host of functions that I have defined for higher level components, which then return datastructures defined in terms of basic html tags. It would be a great idea if I could directly represent even custom tags as the b

clojurescript error

Hi, I have an array of maps defined as below - (def input-boxes [{:name ":person/first-name" :label-text "Full Name" :help-text "Please enter your full name as - First Middle Last"} {:name ":person/ejamaat" :label-text "Ejamaat Number" :placeholder-text "Ejamaat #"} {: