Hi!
I've written a macro to generate tests for functions that have the ":_test"
key in their metadata. I know that clojure.test automatically runs tests
associated with ":test" keys, but I'd like to implement my own test-case
generation.
Here' what it looks like:
(defn my-last
"P01 (*) Find
Yes, good question. It leads to another one: is ther a clojure hook to
stop the server ?
I personally kill the process to sweep out the vm and then can restart
again.
Le jeudi 8 mars 2012 09:21:58 UTC+1, George Oliver a écrit :
>
> hi, I'm just starting with ClojureScript and ClojureScript One
On Thursday, March 8, 2012 9:21:58 AM UTC+1, George Oliver wrote:
>
> hi, I'm just starting with ClojureScript and ClojureScript One.
> Sometimes working with One I kill the cljs-repl for whatever reason
> (something hangs, I make some mistake and can't correct it, etcetera);
> when I go to re
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Brian Goslinga wrote:
> There is a trade off here. If you want to be very portable you'll end up
> with something like the CL path API because you need logicals and file
> revisions to really support VMS, for example.
>
In a former life I spent more time than I no
The syntax ::s/kwd is incorrect syntax: it should be either ::kwd (which
will resolve in the current namespace) or :s/kwd (only one colon).
-S
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.
Looks like you're doing something similar to the clojure.test/with-test
macro.
-S
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be
On Mar 11, 2012 4:10 PM, "Stuart Sierra"
wrote:
>
> The syntax ::s/kwd is incorrect syntax: it should be either ::kwd (which
will resolve in the current namespace) or :s/kwd (only one colon).
>
> -S
::s/kwd is valid, it will cause the namespace of the resulting keyword to
be resolved via the name
Hi,
Am 12.03.2012 um 00:09 schrieb Stuart Sierra:
> The syntax ::s/kwd is incorrect syntax: it should be either ::kwd (which will
> resolve in the current namespace) or :s/kwd (only one colon).
The reader page says, with :: they are resolved in the current namespace. And
this seems to work sin
Hi,
Is this inconsistent behaviour:
user=> `s/foo
s/foo
user=> ::s/foo
#
nil
user=> (require '[clojure.string :as s])
nil
user=> `s/foo
clojure.string/foo
user=> ::s/foo
:clojure.string/foo
I think that ::s/foo should be resolved to :s/foo if there is
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 21:31 +, James Reeves wrote:
> The Clojure docs docs seem to favour the first style [1], but there's
> an ambiguity as to whether "attrs?" means an optional argument or a
> boolean value.
I've also preferred the Clojure doc style, under the theory that
arglists are meant
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Timothy Baldridge wrote:
> > What's the plan for ratios and characters? I assume they're still on
> > the TODO list? (Maybe Issue 17 covers the ratios?)
>
> Yeah, I need to run a few more tests, but I'm thinking of somehow
> layering libgmp ontop of Python in ord
11 matches
Mail list logo
