Hi,
In order to manipulate dom, I often want to bind elements into
variable through def, but we cannot manipulate it until load event.
So I wrapped all def into a load event handler in the following way.
https://gist.github.com/1521051
I don't use let, because many elements cause deep nested let,
a
> Like this? http://brighterplanet.github.com/flight/impact_model.html
> You can see how they handle it (from a Ruby-centric perspective) here:
> https://github.com/brighterplanet/numbers/blob/gh-pages/_posts/2010-12-02-github-pages-rocco-and-rake-file-tasks.markdown
(The original thread seems
There is really one more Lithub concern (at least), and that is how to
structure entry points into a huge codebase like Clojurehow to
present simplifications and toy examples, etc., and walk the reader
through it. I think the other two things are such big wins, though,
that this third concern
Hi folks,
In order to generate the documentation for Ring and Compojure, I
created Codox after being unable to get Autodoc working.
Codox is pretty simple, but should work out of the box, and hopefully
looks quite nice. Here are a couple of examples:
http://mmcgrana.github.com/ring/
http://weave
+1 This is pretty neat! (I too couldn't get Autodoc working in the
past several months.)
Regards,
Shantanu
On Dec 26, 10:29 pm, James Reeves wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> In order to generate the documentation for Ring and Compojure, I
> created Codox after being unable to get Autodoc working.
>
> Codo
I love it, thanks, and I got it running in about 10 seconds:
lein install plugin codox 0.3.1
lein doc
Question: One of my ns docstrings is a fair amount of text which is rendered as
a really long line (because codox puts it inside a ... element). How
would you deal with longer documentation str
Hey guys,
Just wondering, is there any way to integrate clojure.test.generative specs
with leiningen's "lein test" command? I googled but the documentation of
test.generative is pretty scarse. How should I run specs?
Thanks in advance.
Roman.-
--
You received this message because you are subsc
On Dec 22, 2011 3:35 PM, "Tassilo Horn" wrote:
>
> Brian Hurt writes:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> > Vectors are actually a great trade-off, giving you almost the same
> > access and memory costs arrays do, but with all the advantages of
> > being immutable (multi-threaded goodness).
>
> On the other hand,
Hi all,
I've been working a "proof of concept" implementation of some data
structures from Okasaki's book "Purely functional data structures". The
implementations tries to follow the ML implementation describes in the book
so I have defined some macros than use clojure.match to allow patter
Hi everyone,
I've noticed some unexpected behaviour with the unchecked-int function
- I think it's a bug, but I'm not entirely sure I've correctly
understood the purpose of the function.
(type (unchecked-int 0x)) shows long instead of int. This
isn't what I would have expected, either fro
Check out The Dunning Kruger Effect to really see people have
incorrect opinions of themselves
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated
Like this? http://brighterplanet.github.com/flight/impact_model.html
You can see how they handle it (from a Ruby-centric perspective) here:
https://github.com/brighterplanet/numbers/blob/gh-pages/_posts/2010-12-02-github-pages-rocco-and-rake-file-tasks.markdown
The same approach should work fin
I'm working on a project where I want to use clojure macros in part of
my config file that I eval at runtime. However, I'm getting an "Unable
to resolve symbol" exception. So I made a test case to reproduce it
below:
(ns test.core (:gen-class))
(defmacro make-list [& body]
`(list ~@body))
(d
Recently, I found freedom of coding playing with Clojure with over 20
years’ experience on other program languages, Previously, I had
several trials of learning Lisp, but never got traction.
However there are two syntax notations always bother me, it feels
unnatural with my experience on other pro
Recently, I found freedom of coding playing with Clojure with over 20
years’ experience on other program languages, Previously, I had
several trials of learning Lisp, but never got traction.
However there are two syntax notations always bother me, it feels
unnatural with my experience on other pro
Hey Everyone:
I'm working on a project in Clojure that involves parsing binary data
files. Specifically, I'm building a tool for analyzing Redis (http://
redis.io) dump files (.rdb format). The very beginnings of this
nascent project are here: http://github.com/mrb/pianist . I am a
beginner to
Hi,
Am 26.12.2011 um 22:23 schrieb Gert Verhoog:
> Question: One of my ns docstrings is a fair amount of text which is rendered
> as a really long line (because codox puts it inside a ...
> element). How would you deal with longer documentation strings? Would I need
> to insert manual line bre
Hi,
eval happens with *ns* bound to clojure-core. Try to fully qualify make-list.
Sincerely
Meikel
PS: In case you are Chris on SO, I answered your question there also.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send ema
Hi,
I have more than 30 years of dev under my belt dated back to Fortran, Cobol,...
never had a problem with Lisp syntax
Far more bothering to me were immutability and laziness, it took me three
months to get used to it,
not in a home project but laying out production code.
Clojure is a Li
I also thought I would mention that I've been hanging out in #clojure
as mrb_bk - please hit me up if you would like to chat about this.
On Dec 26, 10:08 am, mrb_bk wrote:
> Hey Everyone:
>
> I'm working on a project in Clojure that involves parsing binary data
> files. Specifically, I'm buildin
Hi, does the unpack function in this library do what you're looking
for? https://github.com/geoffsalmon/bytebuffer
It unpacks values from Java's ByteBuffer objects instead of strings,
which seemed more appropriate in Java-land.
I haven't touched the code since Clojure 1.2, but if it looks useful I
Hi there,
I'm using Clojure 1.3.0 and am running into what seems like an edge-
case problem with extend-protocol (?)...
Given (defprotocol MyProtocol (action [x])),
(extend-protocol MyProtocol
(Class/forName "[B") (action [x] "ByteArray")
java.lang.Integer (action [x] "Integer"))
expands to
On Dec 26, 10:21 pm, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm using Clojure 1.3.0 and am running into what seems like an edge-
> case problem with extend-protocol (?)...
>
> Given (defprotocol MyProtocol (action [x])),
>
> (extend-protocol MyProtocol
> (Class/forName "[B") (action [x] "ByteAr
23 matches
Mail list logo
