Hi everyone,
We've just released the next Conj video, Luke VanderHart's talk on
Clojure Zippers: http://clojure.blip.tv/file/4503162/
I've also just blogged over at clojure.com on what our video release
plan is, along with links to videos released so far:
http://clojure.com/blog/2010/12/27/conj-vi
Now that videos are being posted for the 2010 conj, I figured it might
be worth asking if there has been any discussion about when/where the
2011 conj might happen?
I had a schedule conflict last year (actually a double conflict) so
I'd like to get this year's event on my calendar as early as poss
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> Now that videos are being posted for the 2010 conj, I figured it might
> be worth asking if there has been any discussion about when/where the
> 2011 conj might happen?
Conj 2011 will most likely be in either Raleigh or Durham, North
Ca
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Alan Dipert wrote:
> Conj 2011 will most likely be in either Raleigh or Durham, North
> Carolina, and probably will happen around the same time of year as the
> last Conj.
Good to know. I just hope it won't be the weekend of October 22-23 :(
One of the events tha
On Dec 26, 11:42 pm, Alex Osborne wrote:
> justinhj writes:
> > I tried passing *out* to my thread function and then binding it to
> > *out* in the thread, and this works but then makes the threads execute
> > one at a time, and I'm presuming that is because my use of *out* in
> > the binding blo
justinhj writes:
> On Dec 26, 11:42 pm, Alex Osborne wrote:
> (defn test-threads [n out]
> (dotimes [x n]
> (.start (Thread. (#(sleeper-thread %1 %2 %3) out x (+ 2000 (rand-
> int 5000)))
Ah. The problem is here. You're calling that lambda in the main thread
and then passing the re
Your problem is caused by one itty-bitty misplaced parenthesis that is
hard to catch; In your code which creates threads, you do:
(.start (Thread. (#(sleeper-thread %1 %2 %3) out x (+ 2000 (rand-int
5000)))
#(sleeper-thread %1 %2 %3) is exactly the same as just sleeper-thread,
so this boils
Hello everybody,
can members of a record be type hinted? will this enhance performance or
improve storage efficiency?
Sunil.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
what the heck...
mailing-list.print-from-threads> (Thread. ((constantly nil)))
#
mailing-list.print-from-threads> (Thread. ((fn [])))
#
mailing-list.print-from-threads> (Thread. ((fn [] nil)))
#
mailing-list.print-from-threads> (Thread. (let [this-is-nil ((fn []
nil))] this-is-nil))
#
mailing-l
with my preliminary examination it seems like it does enhance storage
efficiency and improve runtime performance.. How would still love to hear
what you all have to say
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Sunil S Nandihalli <
sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> can members
10 matches
Mail list logo
