> On Nov 1, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Chas Emerick wrote:
>
>> FWIW, it doesn't look like `every?` has any inlining:
Ah, I see what's actually going on. My mistake.
It's good to hear about how to do the inline check. Thanks!
-
Brian Marick, Artisanal Labrador
Now working at http://path11.com
Cont
FWIW, it doesn't look like `every?` has any inlining:
=> (with-redefs [every? (constantly 5)]
(every?))
5
The metadata seems to confirm:
=> (meta #'every?)
{:ns #, :name every?, :arglists ([pred coll]), :added
"1.0", :static true, :doc "Returns true if (pred x) is logical true for every x
Clojure sometimes inlines functions. `every?` is an example. As a result, you
can have a function that uses `every?`, call it like so:
(with-redefs [every? (fn [& args] (println "Hi mom!") false)]
(function-that-calls-every))
... and not get the results that the text of the program calls for.
