Anne's recent attempt to start a new thread for this question seems not to
have worked. I'd hate for her and ataggart to be frustrated by further
back-and-forth over the identity of the thread he started, so I'm starting a
new thread for her question.
=== begin content from Anne ===
Sorry for the
Sorry for the confusion - I read this list on an email feed. Turns out
replying to a message from there and changing the subject isn't
sufficient to start a new thread. Apparently it renames the thread.
(suboptimal).
original question:
(use 'clojure.contrib.duck-streams)
(spit "C:\\test.txt"
Anne, please don't threadjack. Now my original subject appears
missing, since you renamed it.
On Aug 6, 1:03 am, Anne Ogborn wrote:
> (use 'clojure.contrib.duck-streams)
> (spit "C:\\test.txt"
> (with-out-str
> (println "foo")
> (println "bar")
> (flush)))
>
> On my XP Tab
What does this return on Windows? (with-out-str (.println
(java.io.PrintWriter. *out*)))
If it's "\r\n", then maybe (newline) should be changed to print
(System/getProperty "line.separator") instead of \newline as it does now.
Thoughts?
-Mike
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Anne Ogborn wrote:
(use 'clojure.contrib.duck-streams)
(spit "C:\\test.txt"
(with-out-str
(println "foo")
(println "bar")
(flush)))
On my XP Tablet OS computer results in a file with unix line endings.
Is this proper behavior?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
