Re: towards definitive "getting started" assistance

2010-04-01 Thread Eric Thorsen
Once I update the getting started stuff for Enclojure, I'll put a link on the Assembla site. Thanks Stu! On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote: > The labrepl now has much better "getting started" instructions, thanks to > everyone who pitched in. But this begs the question: Why h

Re: towards definitive "getting started" assistance

2010-04-01 Thread Rob Wolfe
On 1 Kwi, 10:13, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote: > Hi, > > On Apr 1, 9:58 am, Rob Wolfe wrote: > > > In my opinion this > > description:http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/clojure/Getting_Started_with_Emacs > > is a little bit too terse. > > It assumes that everyone is an Emacs and Java expert > > and

Re: towards definitive "getting started" assistance

2010-04-01 Thread Meikel Brandmeyer
Hi, On Apr 1, 9:58 am, Rob Wolfe wrote: > In my opinion this > description:http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/clojure/Getting_Started_with_Emacs > is a little bit too terse. > It assumes that everyone is an Emacs and Java expert > and Linux user (e.g. no info about ELPA patch for Windows). I th

Re: towards definitive "getting started" assistance

2010-04-01 Thread Rob Wolfe
On 30 Mar, 19:12, Stuart Halloway wrote: > The labrepl now has much better "getting started" instructions, thanks   > to everyone who pitched in. But this begs the question: Why hide the   > getting started instructions in a single project? So, I am working to   > create definitive instructions

Re: towards definitive "getting started" assistance

2010-03-31 Thread Stuart Halloway
This suggests a broader conversation. Clojure stuff currently exists in multiple places as a consequence of point-in-time decisions and organic growth. For now I am going to stick with Assembla, but in the medium run (months) there I want to revisit this idea. Stu Just a thought. Would it

Re: towards definitive "getting started" assistance

2010-03-30 Thread David Nolen
Just a thought. Would it be more effective to create a GitHub page for this? Assembla is cool for ticketing but it's kinda ugly and unfriendly. For example I think something like this: http://mmcgrana.github.com/2010/03/clojure-web-development-ring.html is much friendlier and the kind of base-lev

Re: towards definitive "getting started" assistance

2010-03-30 Thread Wilson MacGyver
Hi, I wrote an blog post on how to use clojure in gradle. That may be of use as part of the "getting started" http://m.3wa.com/?p=464 Thanks, On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote: > The labrepl now has much better "getting started" instructions, thanks to > everyone who pitc

towards definitive "getting started" assistance

2010-03-30 Thread Stuart Halloway
The labrepl now has much better "getting started" instructions, thanks to everyone who pitched in. But this begs the question: Why hide the getting started instructions in a single project? So, I am working to create definitive instructions for getting started with Clojure in a variety of e