Stuart, it is wonderful to hear that someone out there is using test-
expect. I'll get the CA signed so its migration to contrib can
proceed.
-Matt
On Jun 10, 7:52 am, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> I would definitely like to see test-expect added to contrib. If you
> will sign the CA
Hi Matt,
I would definitely like to see test-expect added to contrib. If you
will sign the CA I will move it there. I have a bunch of existing
tests that are simply using binding to do cheap stubbing, and will be
converting those tests to test-expect over the next several days.
Thanks for
Hi Matt,
I would like to move this to contrib, if you will sign the CA. I'll be
moving my simple binding-based stubs to use this and will send along
suggestions if I have any.
Thanks for writing this!
Stu
P.S. Apologies if variants of this message show up twice. Mail client
wonkiness...
>Of course, it was not until I had an early working version that I discovered
>Allen
> Rohner's expectation tools, but I figured that mine were sufficiently
> different to merit further development (at least relative to the
> latest code of his I could find).
>
>
> Suggestions for further changes
When I started working on this library, I thought to myself, "I can't
believe no one has put together an expectation/mocking library" but I
couldn't find one so I went ahead and started my own. Of course, it
was not until I had an early working version that I discovered Allen
Rohner's expectation
