Hi Stuart
Thanks for the explanation, that makes sense and I very much doubt I'd
have figured that out by myself without a lot of head scratching. And
you were right about the intern function, that does exactly what I was
looking for.
Cheers
Chris
On Jul 14, 3:04 am, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> On
On Jul 13, 3:58 pm, Chris Kent wrote:
> user=> (ns a) (def foo "foo")
> a=> #'a/foo
> a=>
>
> If the same code is executed inside a do form the var is defined in
> the original namespace. I thought that the do should make no
> difference. Is this the intended behaviour?
>
> user=> (do (ns a) (d
I've noticed that changing namespace with ns and then doing a def
doesn't behave the same inside a do form:
Without the do form it works as expected:
user=> (ns a) (def foo "foo")
nil
a=> #'a/foo
a=>
If the same code is executed inside a do form the var is defined in
the original namespace. I
