Hi,
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 08:32:42AM -0800, Martin Hauner wrote:
> > (cond
> > (empty? rolls) 0
> > (strike? rolls) (+ (score-strike rolls) (score-after-strike rolls))
> > (spare? rolls) (+ (score-spare rolls) (score-after-frame rolls))
> > (more? rolls) (+ (score-frame
On 12 Feb., 01:34, Timothy Pratley wrote:
> On 12 February 2010 03:19, Martin Hauner wrote:
>
> > I'm mostly interested if there is anything in my code one would/should
> > never do that way.
>
> Looks excellent, you've aced it!
Thanks :-)
> I'd like to discuss switching...You wrote:
>
> (cond
Hi Brandon,
On 11 Feb., 19:59, Brenton wrote:
> Martin,
>
> It's very simple, I like it.
>
> There two things that stand out to me, both having to do with
> readabiliby.
>
> Instead of using (def score) you should use (declare score). declare
> exists for the purpose of making forward declaration
On Feb 11, 4:34 pm, Timothy Pratley wrote:
> On 12 February 2010 03:19, Martin Hauner wrote:
>
> > I'm mostly interested if there is anything in my code one would/should
> > never do that way.
>
> Looks excellent, you've aced it!
>
> I'd like to discuss switching...You wrote:
>
> (cond
> (emp
On 12 February 2010 03:19, Martin Hauner wrote:
> I'm mostly interested if there is anything in my code one would/should
> never do that way.
Looks excellent, you've aced it!
I'd like to discuss switching...
You wrote:
(cond
(empty? rolls) 0
(strike? rolls)(+ (score-strike rolls) (sc
Martin,
It's very simple, I like it.
There two things that stand out to me, both having to do with
readabiliby.
Instead of using (def score) you should use (declare score). declare
exists for the purpose of making forward declarations. That one is
black and white. You have to do it.
The other I
Hi,
I'm doing my first steps in Clojure and I would like to get some
feedback on my implementation of the Bowling Game Kata. The code is
here http://softnoise.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/the-bowling-kata-in-clojure.
I can post the code here if that's preferred.
I'm mostly interested if there is anyt
