I name all of my protocols as active very in the first tense/descriptions of
what they do. Rather than ‘Find’ I would have ‘IFindThings’. It takes a bit of
getting used to and it was a suggestion in something I read a while ago (one of
Steve Yeggies’ posts maybe?) but it really makes you think,
Yes, reusing the names core namespace functions is not uncommon. There are
only so many useful verbs, and namespaces exist so we can use the same
function name for different tasks.
Typically, your ns declaration will look something like:
(ns foo.bar
(:refer-clojure :exclude [get])
(:require '
I am creating a protocol for my entity management and I was going to use
the name 'find' but that is a well known core lib function as is 'get'. I
was curious if it is common practice to still use those methods or if the
collective group have settled on other names for the common 'crud' type
method
