Re: platform-specific unit test failures in cc.test-complex-numbers

2010-04-18 Thread Rich Hickey
On Apr 17, 2010, at 3:50 PM, B Smith-Mannschott wrote: On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 21:32, Stuart Halloway wrote: It's almost certainly the commit that added the InternalReduce protocol: 5b281880571573c5917781de932ce4789f18daec. I am slowly pounding my skull against this and would welcome any

Re: platform-specific unit test failures in cc.test-complex-numbers

2010-04-17 Thread B Smith-Mannschott
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 21:32, Stuart Halloway wrote: > It's almost certainly the commit that added the InternalReduce protocol: > 5b281880571573c5917781de932ce4789f18daec. > > I am slowly pounding my skull against this and would welcome any help. It > appears that the internal-reduce function fla

Re: platform-specific unit test failures in cc.test-complex-numbers

2010-04-17 Thread Stuart Halloway
It's almost certainly the commit that added the InternalReduce protocol: 5b281880571573c5917781de932ce4789f18daec. I am slowly pounding my skull against this and would welcome any help. It appears that the internal-reduce function flakes out and stops working, but only intermittently. If

Re: platform-specific unit test failures in cc.test-complex-numbers

2010-04-17 Thread B Smith-Mannschott
I let Meheadable and George (my two macs) run clojure-contrib builds while I was watching TV to get an idea of the probability of this crash occurring was. George, a 1 GHz PowerPC G4 (1 core) fails 37 of 59 builds (circa 63%) Meheadable, a 2.2 GHz Core2Duo (2 cores) fails 48 of 132 builds (circa 3

Re: platform-specific unit test failures in cc.test-complex-numbers

2010-04-17 Thread B Smith-Mannschott
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 18:02, B Smith-Mannschott wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 15:45, B Smith-Mannschott > wrote: >> More oddness: >> >> If I remove all unit tests *except* test-compex-numbers, all is well: >> >>  [INFO] [clojure:test {execution: test-clojure}] >> >>  Testing clojure.contrib

Re: platform-specific unit test failures in cc.test-complex-numbers

2010-04-17 Thread B Smith-Mannschott
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 15:45, B Smith-Mannschott wrote: > More oddness: > > If I remove all unit tests *except* test-compex-numbers, all is well: > >  [INFO] [clojure:test {execution: test-clojure}] > >  Testing clojure.contrib.test-complex-numbers > >  Ran 8 tests containing 268 assertions. >  0

Re: platform-specific unit test failures in cc.test-complex-numbers

2010-04-17 Thread B Smith-Mannschott
More oddness: If I remove all unit tests *except* test-compex-numbers, all is well: [INFO] [clojure:test {execution: test-clojure}] Testing clojure.contrib.test-complex-numbers Ran 8 tests containing 268 assertions. 0 failures, 0 errors. If I remove only test-complex-numbers, leaving a

Re: platform-specific unit test failures in cc.test-complex-numbers

2010-04-16 Thread Konrad Hinsen
On 16.04.2010, at 19:49, B Smith-Mannschott wrote: > A few representative examples of the failures I'm seeing > ... > FAIL in (complex-conjugate) (run-test1347341999632195512.clj:44) > expected: (= (conjugate (complex 1 2)) (complex 1 -2))

platform-specific unit test failures in cc.test-complex-numbers

2010-04-16 Thread B Smith-Mannschott
I'm building af2a730 "some tests for c.c.io byte-level support" of clojure-contrib. I'm seeing clojure.contrib.test-complex-numbers error out the maven build with 4 failures and 253 errors on two of the five platforms at my disposal. Only my linux-based netbooks fail the build. JDK version does n