Just tossing up some non-juxt alternatives for comparison's sake, so we
can see where it is an improvement.
Sean Devlin writes:
> Notice that juxt creates a closure. The most straightforward case is
> to *predictably* access multiple values from a map.
>
> user=>(def test-map {:a "1" :b "2" :c
Laurent,
1. You are correct. juxt returns a vector. This is based on some
old articles I wrote, and I must of missed those references.
2. Guilty :) The partial is (deliberate) overkill.
Sean
On Dec 18, 4:17 am, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2009/12/18 Sean Devlin
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hello ev
Hello,
2009/12/18 Sean Devlin
> Hello everyone,
> Today I'd like to shed some light on a new funciton in 1.1, juxt. In
> order to understand juxt(apose), I'd like to first talk about comp
> (ose). Comp can be defined in terms of reduce like so:
>
> (defn my-comp [& fns]
> (fn [args]
>(red
Hello everyone,
Today I'd like to shed some light on a new funciton in 1.1, juxt. In
order to understand juxt(apose), I'd like to first talk about comp
(ose). Comp can be defined in terms of reduce like so:
(defn my-comp [& fns]
(fn [args]
(reduce
(fn[accum f](f accum))
(conj (
