On 17 mei, 08:48, Fabio Kaminski wrote:
> first that dinamic languages are better for developers, but you loose some
> performance compared to typed languages.. and jvm was created with types in
> mind.. so right now clojure data structures are implemented in java and
> typed, when you get it in
first that dinamic languages are better for developers, but you loose some
performance compared to typed languages.. and jvm was created with types in
mind.. so right now clojure data structures are implemented in java and
typed, when you get it in the clojure runtime its boxed already.
theres som
> for the persistent data.. well all this "laziness" and dinamic types, and on
> top of that immutability should not perform well in pure clojure
Why?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@go
Yes, it was what i think seeing the sources...
for the compiler part, its a good decision since lisps are the best tool for
it.. but i dont think its a priority
and even dont need to be.. sure there more importants things to be done...
for the persistent data.. well all this "laziness" and dinami
Fabio,
Yes, there is a plan to implement Clojure in Clojure and protocols, et
al., are part of this.
This biggest part from a performance point of view is not the compiler
itself, but rather Clojure's persistent data structures (maps,
vectors, etc.).
You can find more of the discussion around th
Hi all,
since clojure-dev its a managed list.. the question goes here..
i read somewhere that protocols was implemented thinking (inclusive) for
natively clojure the compiler, at this moment implemented in java.
so, my question is, is this gonna happen?
and if so, in what version of clojure we w