On Jan 6, 11:21 am, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> You might be able to simplify this by having just one Ref containing
> the global "state" of the game.
Hi Stuart, yes I agree that is the better approach.
I went down the 'multi-mutable' path trying to improve relationship
handling. Consider two rooms
I've developed a
> helper which can update in place any mutable map, handles nested
> access, and behaves like assoc on immutables.
>
> It allows usage like so:
> ; set up a mutable map of mutable players - tongue twister
> (def players (ref nil))
> (mset players "tim&quo
e map of mutable players - tongue twister
(def players (ref nil))
(mset players "tim" (ref {:str 5 :con 5}))
(mset players "tom" (ref {:str 7 :con 2}))
; change some attributes
(mset players "tim" :str 6)
(mset players "tim" :con 4)
(mset players "tim&qu
