So I followed the steps and it did not work:
> 3) This will automatically create a filter on words:
> list:""
however after changing filter to >>Matches:
to:(clojure.googlegroups.com) Do this: Apply label "clojure"<< all
seems to be just fine and I am a happy camper ...
Thank you,
Andy
--
Yo
In gmail:
1) click the down arrow next to "clojure" in the subject line (it has
a "Show details" tooltip).
2) click the "filter messages from this mailing list" link next to
the mailing list
3) This will automatically create a filter on words:
list:""
4) Proceed to the next option "Create a fil
The [clj] option is not a bad compromise.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubs
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Andy Coolware wrote:
> Managing subfolders is out a question for me since I use multiple
> clients over IMAP. That would be a mess. I wish Thunderbird and gmail
> have an option to split the traffic by group in some automated fashion
I'm a bit surprised to hear th
Hi,
thx a lot for all viewpoints. I am personally a bit torn. On one
hand, when I open my gmail I have hard time to distinguish between all
groups I am subscribed too. When you get tens of threads updated
daily, this is really handy. However, I hate to have a redundant
information in Subject and
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Jay Fields wrote:
> this is also true of the ActionScript solution...
Actually, no (depending on exactly how you do it in AppleScript). At
least one of the possible AppleScript solutions changes the subject
for your display but does not actually change it in the m
this is also true of the ActionScript solution...
let's get back on topic, tabs or spaces?
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Dave Kincaid writes:
>
> >> [Automatic insertion of [clojure] depending on user preference]
> >
> > Seems like a great enhancement that Google could
Dave Kincaid writes:
>> [Automatic insertion of [clojure] depending on user preference]
>
> Seems like a great enhancement that Google could make. Give each
> subscriber this as an option. Then each of us can choose whether to
> add this or not to messages we see.
No, that's actually not a very
Seems like a great enhancement that Google could make. Give each subscriber
this as an option. Then each of us can choose whether to add this or not to
messages we see.
Personally, I only read these groups on the web and seeing [clojure] in the
subject of every message would be really annoying.
Personally, I'd like to have [] as well, but I've recently been educated on
the opposing point of view - and I concede that your personal workflow
determines what you prefer - and, it's all preferences at the end of the
day (no right or wrong answer). My personal workflow would benefit from [],
Phi
e.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Marick
Sender: clojure@googlegroups.com
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:31:22
To:
Reply-To: clojure@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: meta-questions - [clojure] in front of Subject line
On Jun 17, 2012, at 7:23 PM, Peter Buckley wrote:
> I know mac products ar
On 18/06/12 11:50, Lee Spector wrote:
On Jun 18, 2012, at 3:02 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
There's really no need to obscure subjects. For all your filtering
needs, there's the List-ID header:
List-ID:
Here's a SIEVE snippet you can install somehow to your IMAP server to
move messages to this l
On Jun 18, 2012, at 3:02 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>
> There's really no need to obscure subjects. For all your filtering
> needs, there's the List-ID header:
>
> List-ID:
>
> Here's a SIEVE snippet you can install somehow to your IMAP server to
> move messages to this list to some special gro
Brian Marick writes:
>> I have been subscribed to a couple of groups as well as other stuff
>> and find it useful to have a Subject line prefix indicating the
>> source of conversation.
>
> +1
-1!
There's really no need to obscure subjects. For all your filtering
needs, there's the List-ID hea
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Brian Marick wrote:
> The complaint about reading the mailing list on phones is valid. I do wonder
> how many people use phones as their main, workaday interface, and how much an
> extra inconvenience 9 characters is when they're already trying to view the
> wor
On Jun 17, 2012, at 7:23 PM, Peter Buckley wrote:
> I know mac products are designed for non-technical people and leave out most
> common options, but can't they do something so simple and 1980's-esque as
> filter on a field other than subject?
>
> I've been using gmail and have had a rule for
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Lee Spector wrote:
> Mac OS X Mail.app does indeed allow filtering by addresses, etc. Nonetheless,
> for some people and some workflows (including me any my workflow) it'd be
> helpful to have a textual marker in the subject line. Not a huge deal, for me
> at le
On Jun 17, 2012, at 8:23 PM, Peter Buckley wrote:
> Having [clojure] in front of the subject obscures the subject with redundant
> information. It's wasting valuable space at the front of the subject line
> that could be used for, well, the subject, which I'm actually interested in.
>
> The m
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Peter Buckley wrote:
> Having [clojure] in front of the subject obscures the subject with redundant
> information. It's wasting valuable space at the front of the subject line
> that could be used for, well, the subject, which I'm actually interested in.
Agree.
8:32:33
To:
Reply-To: clojure@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: meta-questions - [clojure] in front of Subject line
On Jun 17, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> Have you considered a more capable client?
My client is OSX Mail. I don't think it's a marginal client.
What inconvenience wou
On Jun 17, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> Have you considered a more capable client?
My client is OSX Mail. I don't think it's a marginal client.
What inconvenience would users of more capable clients suffer if a "[clojure]"
were added?
Given that the change to Google Groups is ~3-
Have you considered a more capable client?
-Phil
On Jun 17, 2012 11:45 AM, "Andy Coolware" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been subscribed to a couple of groups as well as other stuff
> and find it useful to have a Subject line prefix indicating the source
> of conversation.
>
> Would it be possible to
On Jun 17, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Andy Coolware wrote:
> I have been subscribed to a couple of groups as well as other stuff
> and find it useful to have a Subject line prefix indicating the source
> of conversation.
+1
-
Brian Marick, Artisanal Labrador
Now working at http://path11.com
Contract
Hi,
I have been subscribed to a couple of groups as well as other stuff
and find it useful to have a Subject line prefix indicating the source
of conversation.
Would it be possible to add something like that [clojure]
Thx,
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
24 matches
Mail list logo
