Re: logging recommendation

2010-11-23 Thread lprefontaine
We use a combination of apache common logging and log4j. In dev we can remove log4j and still have some decent console logging. Luc P. Dave Newton wrote .. > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Stuart Sierra > wrote: > > > On Nov 20, 5:56 pm, HiHeelHottie wrote: > > > What do you recommend for lo

Re: logging recommendation

2010-11-23 Thread Dave Newton
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote: > On Nov 20, 5:56 pm, HiHeelHottie wrote: > > What do you recommend for logging, especially to a set of rolling > > files? Simply use log4j? > > I manage with Log4j. The .properties configuration file is annoying > sometimes, but it works. >

Re: logging recommendation

2010-11-23 Thread Stuart Sierra
On Nov 20, 5:56 pm, HiHeelHottie wrote: > What do you recommend for logging, especially to a set of rolling > files?  Simply use log4j? I manage with Log4j. The .properties configuration file is annoying sometimes, but it works. -S -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: logging recommendation

2010-11-21 Thread David Plumpton
On Nov 21, 11:56 am, HiHeelHottie wrote: > What do you recommend for logging, especially to a set of rolling > files?  Simply use log4j? Log4j has been a dead project for a few years now. Try slf4j and logback. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojur

logging recommendation

2010-11-20 Thread HiHeelHottie
What do you recommend for logging, especially to a set of rolling files? Simply use log4j? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated -