Hey,
I replied in the ticket with some comments. The main issue I see is
that I'm used to the notion that IPersistentLists are things which are
not lazy and which have next/rest parts which are themselves IPLs and
this approach seems to cause that no longer to be the case. If it were
not to be the
I found CLJ-1060 [1] and added there a patch with Cons implementing
IPersistentList and (apply list args) in one-argument case of list*.
Marek
[1] http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1060
On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 9:35:25 PM UTC+1, Marek Šrank wrote:
>
> function list* doesn't return
On 27 December 2012 18:52, Ben Wolfson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Michał Marczyk
> wrote:
>> On 27 December 2012 03:28, Tom Jack wrote:
>>> It looks like the only thing missing to make Cons implement IPersistentList
>>> is IPersistentStack. Why not implement it?
>>
>> IPersistentS
Making Cons implement IPersistentList will solve all cases except when
list* gets only one argument. This is problematic. The source looks like
this:
(defn list*
"Creates a new list containing the items prepended to the rest, the
last of which will be treated as a sequence."
{:added "1.0"
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Michał Marczyk
wrote:
> On 27 December 2012 03:28, Tom Jack wrote:
>> It looks like the only thing missing to make Cons implement IPersistentList
>> is IPersistentStack. Why not implement it?
>
> IPersistentStack extends IPersistentCollection, which includes
> cou
On 27 December 2012 03:28, Tom Jack wrote:
> It looks like the only thing missing to make Cons implement IPersistentList
> is IPersistentStack. Why not implement it?
IPersistentStack extends IPersistentCollection, which includes
count(), so that's no go for Cons (the rest part might be a lazy seq
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Tom Jack wrote:
> A small bug in ClojureScript was related to this:
> https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/commit/88b36c177ebd1bb49dbd874a9d13652fd1de4027
>
> It looks like the only thing missing to make Cons implement IPersistentList
> is IPersistentStack. Why
A small bug in ClojureScript was related to this:
https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/commit/88b36c177ebd1bb49dbd874a9d13652fd1de4027
It looks like the only thing missing to make Cons implement IPersistentList
is IPersistentStack. Why not implement it?
On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 4:13:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Stephen Compall
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 12:35 -0800, Marek Šrank wrote:
>> ...however, its docstring says: "Creates a new list containing the items
>> prepended to the rest, the last of which will be treated as a sequence."
>
> List is almost always colloqui
On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 12:35 -0800, Marek Šrank wrote:
> ...however, its docstring says: "Creates a new list containing the items
> prepended to the rest, the last of which will be treated as a sequence."
List is almost always colloquial, not literally IPersistentList.
I would be in favor of elim
function list* doesn't return a list, because it uses 'cons' under the hood:
(list? (list* 1 2 3 '()))
;=> false
(class (list* 1 2 3 '()))
;=> clojure.lang.Cons
...however, its docstring says: "Creates a new list containing the items
prepended to the rest, the last of which will be treated as a
11 matches
Mail list logo